Literature DB >> 9636981

The Bagby and Kuslich method of lumbar interbody fusion. History, techniques, and 2-year follow-up results of a United States prospective, multicenter trial.

S D Kuslich1, C L Ulstrom, S L Griffith, J W Ahern, J D Dowdle.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective, multicenter trial of the Bagby and Kuslich method of lumbar interbody stabilization for chronic discogenic low back pain, with follow-up evaluation at 3 months, 6 months, and yearly thereafter, with independent radiographic analysis.
OBJECTIVES: To report the history of development, the surgical techniques, and results of the Bagby and Kuslich method when used to manage discogenic pain of the lumbar spine in humans. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Disabling chronic low back pain frequently is resistant to conservative management. The "Bagby Basket" effectively has fused the equine and baboon spine. The results of biomechanical and animal studies performed over the last 20 years have suggested that a similar but improved design--the Bagby and Kuslich device--would be useful in stabilizing the human spine.
METHODS: From 1992 to 1995, 947 patients with chronic discogenic low back pain were treated by Bagby and Kuslich interbody fusion in a strict, multicenter, prospective clinical trial by using either the open anterior or open posterior approach. The study involved 42 surgeons at 19 medical centers. The authors of the current report analyzed the fusion rates, pain relief, functional status, and complications occurring in patients who underwent long-term follow-up observation.
RESULTS: The Bagby and Kuslich method is safe and effective when compared with methods described in previous reports of posterior and anterior lumbar interbody arthrodesis performed by using bone graft alone. Fusion occurred in 91% of patients at 24 months after surgery, and pain was eliminated or reduced in 84%. Function was improved in 91%. There were no device-related deaths, cases of major paralyses, device failures, or deep infections.
CONCLUSIONS: Carefully selected middle-aged patients with chronic low back pain secondary to degenerative disc disease can be treated effectively and safely by skilled surgeons using the Bagby and Kuslich device for one- and two-level interbody fusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9636981     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199806010-00019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  69 in total

1.  Anterior lumbar interbody fusion: does stable anterior fixation matter?

Authors:  S S Madan; J M Harley; N R Boeree
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-05-24       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The importance of the endplate for interbody cages in the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Anne Polikeit; Stephen J Ferguson; Lutz P Nolte; Tracy E Orr
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-05-29       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Factors influencing stresses in the lumbar spine after the insertion of intervertebral cages: finite element analysis.

Authors:  Anne Polikeit; Stephen J Ferguson; Lutz P Nolte; Tracy E Orr
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-12-19       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Biomechanical and clinical study of single posterior oblique cage POLIF in the treatment of degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Antonino Zagra; Laura Scaramuzzo; Fabio Galbusera; Leone Minoia; Marino Archetti; Fabrizio Giudici
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a safe technique with satisfactory three to five year results.

Authors:  Lars Hackenberg; Henry Halm; Viola Bullmann; Volker Vieth; Marc Schneider; Ulf Liljenqvist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-01-26       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  CT evaluation of lumbar interbody fusion: current concepts.

Authors:  Alan L Williams; Matthew F Gornet; J Kenneth Burkus
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 7.  [Interbody metal implants ("cages") for lumbar fusion].

Authors:  G Freiherr von Salis-Soglio; R Scholz; K Seller
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Comparison of two interbody fusion cages for posterior lumbar interbody fusion in a cadaveric model.

Authors:  Shih-Tien Wang; Vijay K Goel; Chong-Yau Fu; Shinichiro Kubo; Woosung Choi; Chien-Lin Liu; Tain-Hsiung Chen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Anterior cervical spinal fusion with the Intromed ZWE System: preliminary experience.

Authors:  Johannes Schröder; Florian Grosse-Dresselhaus; Christoph Schul; Hansdetlef Wassmann
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2006-10-28       Impact factor: 3.042

10.  Comparison of plain radiographs with CT scan to evaluate interbody fusion following the use of titanium interbody cages and transpedicular instrumentation.

Authors:  Rajesh R Shah; Saeed Mohammed; Asif Saifuddin; Benjamin A Taylor
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-05-07       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.