Literature DB >> 9617647

Does CME work? An analysis of the effect of educational activities on physician performance or health care outcomes.

D Davis1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To answer the question, "does CME work?" by reviewing the effectiveness of continuing medical education (CME) and other related educational methods on objectively-determined physician performance and/or health care outcomes. These interventions include educational materials, formal, planned CME activities or programs, outreach visits such as academic detailing, opinion leaders, patient-mediated strategies, audit and feedback, reminders, or a combination of these strategies.
METHODS: MEDLINE, ERIC, NTIS, the Research and Development Resource Base in CME and other relevant data sources including review articles were searched for relevant terms, from 1975 to 1994. Of those articles retrieved, randomized controlled trials of educational strategies or interventions which objectively assessed physician performance and/or health care outcomes were selected for review. Data were extracted from each article about the specialty of the physician targeted, the clinical subject of the intervention, the setting and the nature of the educational method, and the presence or degree of needs assessment or barriers to change.
RESULTS: More than two-thirds of the studies (70%) displayed a change in physician performance, while almost half (48%) of interventions produced a change in health care outcomes. Community-based strategies such as academic detailing (and to a lesser extent, opinion leaders), practice-based methods such as reminders and patient-mediated strategies, and multiple interventions appeared to be most effective activities. Mixed results and weaker outcomes were demonstrated by audit and educational materials, while formal CME conferences without enabling or practice-reinforcing strategies, had relatively little impact.
CONCLUSION: Strategies which enable and/or reinforce appear to "work" in changing physician performance or health care outcomes, a finding which has significant impact on the delivery of CME, and the need for further research into physician learning and change.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9617647     DOI: 10.2190/UA3R-JX9W-MHR5-RC81

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychiatry Med        ISSN: 0091-2174            Impact factor:   1.210


  40 in total

1.  Modification of general practitioner prescribing of antibiotics by use of a therapeutics adviser (academic detailer).

Authors:  K F Ilett; S Johnson; G Greenhill; L Mullen; J Brockis; C L Golledge; D B Reid
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Does continuing medical education in general practice make a difference?

Authors:  P Cantillon; R Jones
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-05-08

Review 3.  Cost effectiveness of continuing professional development in health care: a critical review of the evidence.

Authors:  C A Brown; C R Belfield; S J Field
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-16

4.  Teaching community program clinicians motivational interviewing using expert and train-the-trainer strategies.

Authors:  Steve Martino; Samuel A Ball; Charla Nich; Monica Canning-Ball; Bruce J Rounsaville; Kathleen M Carroll
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 6.526

Review 5.  [Dilemmas and alternatives in the evaluation of family doctor training].

Authors:  J R Loayssa Lara
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 1.137

6.  The role of distance learning in specialist medical training.

Authors:  H Davies; D M B Hall; V Harpin; C Pullan
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 7.  Primary care practice-based research networks: working at the interface between research and quality improvement.

Authors:  James W Mold; Kevin A Peterson
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

8.  Impact of institutional review board practice variation on observational health services research.

Authors:  Lee A Green; Julie C Lowery; Christine P Kowalski; Leon Wyszewianski
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Billing for the Evaluation and Treatment of Adult Depression by the Primary Care Clinician.

Authors:  Richard J Goldberg; Thomas E Oxman
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2004

10.  The role of consultation calls for clinic supervisors in supporting large-scale dissemination of evidence-based treatments for children.

Authors:  Erum Nadeem; Alissa Gleacher; Sandra Pimentel; Laura Campbell Hill; Mary McHugh; Kimberly E Hoagwood
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2013-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.