AIMS: The effectiveness of expert-led (EX) and train-the-trainer (TT) strategies was compared to a self-study approach (SS) for teaching clinicians motivational interviewing (MI). DESIGN:Twelve community treatment programs were assigned randomly to the three conditions. EX and TT conditions used skill-building workshops and three monthly supervision sessions guided by treatment integrity ratings, performance feedback and coaching techniques. Trainers in TT were first trained and certified in MI and then prepared carefully to deliver the workshops and supervise MI at their programs. Clinicians in SS only received the training materials. SETTING: Licensed out-patient and residential addiction and mental health treatment programs in the US state of Connecticut were involved in the study. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-two clinicians who provided addiction treatment within these programs and had limited experience with MI participated in the study. MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcomes were the clinicians' MI adherence and competence and the percentage of clinicians meeting clinical trial standards of MI performance. Assessments occurred at baseline, post-workshop, post-supervision and at 12-week follow-up. FINDINGS: The study found EX and TT, in comparison to SS, improved clinicians' adherence and competence significantly, with higher percentages of clinicians reaching clinical trial standards of MI performance and few differences between EX and TT. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the combined use of workshops and supervision to teach community program clinicians MI and suggests the train-the-trainer approach may be a feasible and effective strategy for disseminating empirically supported treatments.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: The effectiveness of expert-led (EX) and train-the-trainer (TT) strategies was compared to a self-study approach (SS) for teaching clinicians motivational interviewing (MI). DESIGN: Twelve community treatment programs were assigned randomly to the three conditions. EX and TT conditions used skill-building workshops and three monthly supervision sessions guided by treatment integrity ratings, performance feedback and coaching techniques. Trainers in TT were first trained and certified in MI and then prepared carefully to deliver the workshops and supervise MI at their programs. Clinicians in SS only received the training materials. SETTING: Licensed out-patient and residential addiction and mental health treatment programs in the US state of Connecticut were involved in the study. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-two clinicians who provided addiction treatment within these programs and had limited experience with MI participated in the study. MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcomes were the clinicians' MI adherence and competence and the percentage of clinicians meeting clinical trial standards of MI performance. Assessments occurred at baseline, post-workshop, post-supervision and at 12-week follow-up. FINDINGS: The study found EX and TT, in comparison to SS, improved clinicians' adherence and competence significantly, with higher percentages of clinicians reaching clinical trial standards of MI performance and few differences between EX and TT. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the combined use of workshops and supervision to teach community program clinicians MI and suggests the train-the-trainer approach may be a feasible and effective strategy for disseminating empirically supported treatments.
Authors: John S Baer; Samuel A Ball; Barbara K Campbell; Gloria M Miele; Eugene P Schoener; Kathlene Tracy Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2006-10-04 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Kathleen M Carroll; Charla Nich; Donna M Lapaglia; Erica N Peters; Caroline J Easton; Nancy M Petry Journal: Addiction Date: 2012-05-08 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Adam C Brooks; Graham Diguiseppi; Alexandre Laudet; Beth Rosenwasser; Dan Knoblach; Carolyn M Carpenedo; Deni Carise; Kimberly C Kirby Journal: J Subst Abuse Treat Date: 2012-02-01
Authors: Carrie B Jackson; Amy D Herschell; Ashley T Scudder; Jonathan Hart; Kristen F Schaffner; David J Kolko; Stanley Mrozowski Journal: Adm Policy Ment Health Date: 2021-03-17
Authors: Steve Martino; Paula Zimbrean; Ariadna Forray; Joy S Kaufman; Paul H Desan; Todd A Olmstead; Kathryn Gilstad-Hayden; Ralitza Gueorguieva; Kimberly A Yonkers Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-08-29 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Denise E Wilfley; Ellen E Fitzsimmons-Craft; Dawn M Eichen; Dorothy J Van Buren; R Robinson Welch; Athena H Robinson; Booil Jo; Ramesh Raghavan; Enola K Proctor; G Terence Wilson; W Stewart Agras Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2018-07-06 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Darren R Christensen; Reid D Landes; Lisa Jackson; Lisa A Marsch; Michael J Mancino; Mohit P Chopra; Warren K Bickel Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2014-08-04