Literature DB >> 9614011

The need for a national body for research misconduct. Nothing less will reassure the public.

R Smith.   

Abstract

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Committee on Publication Ethics (Great Britain)

Mesh：

Year:  1998        PMID： 9614011      PMCID： PMC1113269          DOI： 10.1136/bmj.316.7146.1686

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN： 0959-8138


× No keyword cloud information.
  9 in total

1.  Was the paper I wrote a fraud?

Authors:  Cameron Bowie
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-06-06

2.  Retraction. Evidence of unmet need in the care of physically disabled adults.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-06-06

3.  Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. An American perspective on research integrity.

Authors:  D Rennie
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-06-06

4.  Lessons from the Bristol case. More openness--on risks and on individual surgeons' performance.

Authors:  T Treasure
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-06-06

5.  Doctor admits research fraud.

Authors:  C Dyer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-02-28

6.  Misconduct in research: editors respond.

Authors:  R Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-07-26

7.  Research misconduct.

Authors:  M J Farthing
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Will the UK cope?

Authors:  R Horton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-07-26       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Evidence of unmet need in the care of severely physically disabled adults.

Authors:  M H Williams; C Bowie
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-01-09
  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Fraud. Fair and efficient system of investigating alleged misconduct can be devised.

Authors:  L Breimer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-12-05

2.  Should local research ethics committees monitor research they have approved?

Authors:  E Pickworth
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.903
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.