Literature DB >> 9253258

Misconduct in research: editors respond.

R Smith.   

Abstract

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Committee on Publication Ethics (Great Britain)

Mesh：

Year:  1997        PMID： 9253258      PMCID： PMC2127155          DOI： 10.1136/bmj.315.7102.201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN： 0959-8138


× No keyword cloud information.
  7 in total

1.  [Peer review in scientific journals].

Authors:  J Gérvas; M Pérez Fernández
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2001-04-15       Impact factor: 1.137

2.  Emerging ethical issues in instructions to authors of high-impact biomedical journals.

Authors:  Michel C Atlas
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2003-10

3.  Dealing with editorial misconduct.

Authors:  Fiona Godlee
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-12-04

4.  Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. An American perspective on research integrity.

Authors:  D Rennie
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-06-06

5.  The need for a national body for research misconduct. Nothing less will reassure the public.

Authors:  R Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-06-06

6.  Serum samples in clinical study were manipulated.

Authors:  R Szibor; W Kuchheuser; C Luley; D Krause
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-02-21

7.  Should local research ethics committees monitor research they have approved?

Authors:  E Pickworth
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.903
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.