Literature DB >> 9614029

Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. An American perspective on research integrity.

D Rennie1.   

Abstract

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Office of Research Integrity

Mesh：

Year:  1998        PMID： 9614029      PMCID： PMC1113279          DOI： 10.1136/bmj.316.7146.1726

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN： 0959-8138


× No keyword cloud information.
  15 in total

1.  Doctor admits research fraud.

Authors:  C Dyer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-02-28

2.  International recruitment highlights need to track scientific behaviour.

Authors:  R Dalton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-09-12       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  The scientific misconduct process: a scientist's view from the inside.

Authors:  J S Youngner
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-01-07       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Dealing with deception.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-03-30       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  The misconduct of redundant publication.

Authors:  M Doherty
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 19.103

6.  Misconduct in medical research: does it exist in Britain?

Authors:  S Lock
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-12-10

7.  Scientific misconduct. New definition, procedures, and office--perhaps a new leaf.

Authors:  D Rennie; C K Gunsalus
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-02-17       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Time to face up to research misconduct.

Authors:  R Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-03-30

9.  Accountability, audit, and reverence for the publication process.

Authors:  D Rennie
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-07-28       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Lessons from the Darsee affair.

Authors:  A S Relman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-06-09       Impact factor: 91.245
View more
  9 in total

1.  Dealing with editorial misconduct.

Authors:  Fiona Godlee
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-12-04

2.  Managing allegations of research misconduct.

Authors:  Edmund Hey
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  The implications of fraud in medical and scientific research.

Authors:  Alistair A P Slesser; Yassar A Qureshi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Falsified papers in high-impact journals were slow to retract and indistinguishable from nonfraudulent papers.

Authors:  Nikolaos A Trikalinos; Evangelos Evangelou; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Fraud. Fair and efficient system of investigating alleged misconduct can be devised.

Authors:  L Breimer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-12-05

6.  The need for a national body for research misconduct. Nothing less will reassure the public.

Authors:  R Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-06-06

Review 7.  Ethics in exercise science research.

Authors:  Roy J Shephard
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Confidentiality and the duties of care.

Authors:  J O'Brien; C Chantler
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 9.  The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles.

Authors:  Felicitas Hesselmann; Verena Graf; Marion Schmidt; Martin Reinhart
Journal:  Curr Sociol       Date:  2016-10-13
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.