Literature DB >> 9610119

Creating proactive interference in immediate recall: building a dog from a dart, a mop, and a fig.

G Tehan1, M S Humphreys.   

Abstract

Phonemic codes are accorded a privileged role in most current models of immediate serial recall, although their effects are apparent in short-term proactive interference (PI) effects as well. The present research looks at how assumptions concerning distributed representation and distributed storage involving both semantic and phonemic codes might be operationalized to produce PI in a short-term cued recall task. The four experiments reported here attempted to generate the phonemic characteristics of a nonrhyming, interfering foil from unrelated filler items in the same list. PI was observed when a rhyme of the foil was studied or when the three phonemes of the foil were distributed across three studied filler items. The results suggest that items in short-term memory are stored in terms of feature bundles and that all items are simultaneously available at retrieval.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9610119     DOI: 10.3758/bf03201157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  18 in total

1.  The intricacy of memory span.

Authors:  M J Watkins
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1977-09

2.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.

Authors:  G R Loftus; M E Masson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

3.  Cuing effects in short-term recall.

Authors:  G Tehan; M S Humphreys
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1996-11

4.  Set-size effects in primary memory: an age-related capacity limitation?

Authors:  G S Halford; M T Maybery; J D Bain
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1988-09

5.  Phonemic storage of concrete and abstract words with auditory presentation.

Authors:  W N Runquist; M Blackmore
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1973-12

6.  Developing TODAM: three models for serial-order information.

Authors:  B B Murdock
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1995-09

7.  Transient phonemic codes and immunity to proactive interference.

Authors:  G Tehan; M S Humphreys
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1995-03

Review 8.  A multinomial processing tree model for degradation and redintegration in immediate recall.

Authors:  R Schweickert
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1993-03

9.  The role of auditory features in memory span for words.

Authors:  A Drewnowski; B B Murdock
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-05

10.  A retrieval model for both recognition and recall.

Authors:  G Gillund; R M Shiffrin
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  16 in total

1.  The phonological similarity effect in immediate recall: positions of shared phonemes.

Authors:  X Li; R Schweickert; J Gandour
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-10

2.  Maintenance of semantic information in capacity-limited item short-term memory.

Authors:  H Haarmann; M Usher
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-09

3.  Expecting dirt but saying dart: the creation of a blend memory.

Authors:  M S Humphreys; J S Burt; S Lawrence
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-12

4.  Target similarity effects: support for the parallel distributed processing assumptions.

Authors:  M S Humphreys; G Tehan; A O'Shea; S W Bolland
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-07

5.  Perceptual specificity of priming for compound words not presented.

Authors:  Todd C Jones
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-04

6.  Temporal grouping in auditory spatial serial memory.

Authors:  Fabrice B R Parmentier; Murray T Maybery; Dylan M Jones
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-06

7.  Memory Interference as a Determinant of Language Comprehension.

Authors:  Julie A Van Dyke; Clinton L Johns
Journal:  Lang Linguist Compass       Date:  2012-03-12

8.  Effects of repetition and response deadline on associative recognition in young and older adults.

Authors:  Leah L Light; Meredith M Patterson; Christie Chung; Michael R Healy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-10

9.  Modulating the phonological similarity effect: the contribution of interlist similarity and lexicality.

Authors:  Paul Johan Karlsen; Arild Lian
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-04

10.  Proactive interference and cuing effects in short-term cued recall: does foil context matter?

Authors:  Winston D Goh; Huiqin Tan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.