Literature DB >> 11848605

Expecting dirt but saying dart: the creation of a blend memory.

M S Humphreys1, J S Burt, S Lawrence.   

Abstract

During a naming task, time pressure and a manipulation of the proportion of related prime-target pairs were used to induce subjects to generate an expectation to the prime. On some trials, the presented target was orthographically and generally phonologically similar to the expected target. The expectancy manipulation was barely detectable in the priming data but was clearly evident on a final recognition test. In addition, the recognition data showed that the nearly simultaneous activation of an expectation and sensory information derived from the orthographically and phonologically similar target produced a false memory. It is argued that this represents a blend memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11848605     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  12 in total

1.  Target similarity effects: support for the parallel distributed processing assumptions.

Authors:  M S Humphreys; G Tehan; A O'Shea; S W Bolland
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-07

2.  FALSE RECOGNITION PRODUCED BY IMPLICIT VERBAL RESPONSES.

Authors:  B J UNDERWOOD
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1965-07

3.  Creating proactive interference in immediate recall: building a dog from a dart, a mop, and a fig.

Authors:  G Tehan; M S Humphreys
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-05

4.  Semantic-context effects on word recognition: Influence of varying the proportion of items presented in an appropriate context.

Authors:  J R Tweedy; R H Lapinski; R W Schvaneveldt
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1977-01

5.  A model for recognition memory: REM-retrieving effectively from memory.

Authors:  R M Shiffrin; M Steyvers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1997-06

6.  Semantic priming in the pronunciation task: the role of prospective prime-generated expectancies.

Authors:  D E Keefe; J H Neely
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1990-05

7.  Context change and the role of meaning in word recognition.

Authors:  B J Underwood; M Humphreys
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1979-12

8.  Pre- and postlexical loci of contextual effects on word recognition.

Authors:  M S Seidenberg; G S Waters; M Sanders; P Langer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1984-07

9.  Criterion bias and search sequence bias in word recognition.

Authors:  R E O'Connor; K I Forster
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1981-01

10.  A context noise model of episodic word recognition.

Authors:  S Dennis; M S Humphreys
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  1 in total

1.  Paws + cause = pause? Memory load and memory blends in homophone recognition.

Authors:  Tamiko Azuma; Erica J Williams; Juliet E Davie
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.