Literature DB >> 7731363

Transient phonemic codes and immunity to proactive interference.

G Tehan1, M S Humphreys.   

Abstract

Empirical data indicate that when memory for subspan lists of taxonomically related material is tested immediately after study, prior experience with lists involving the same material has no effect upon recall or recognition. In six experiments, we explored the possibility that immunity to proactive interference (PI) is related to discriminative information that is provided by transient phonemic codes. In these experiments, we manipulated the strength of phonemic codes as well as their presence or absence. Immunity to PI was found only when it was presumed that a phonemic representation of the target items existed and that information provided discriminative information. In all other cases, PI was observed. The finding that PI effects correspond with the manipulation of phonemic information in a principled fashion provides strong evidence for the role of phonemic codes in producing short-term PI effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7731363     DOI: 10.3758/bf03197220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  16 in total

1.  Short-term retention of individual verbal items.

Authors:  L R PETERSON; M J PETERSON
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-09

2.  Output and retrieval interference in the missing-number task.

Authors:  J A Hadley; A F Healy; B B Murdock
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-01

Review 3.  A feature model of immediate memory.

Authors:  J S Nairne
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1990-05

Review 4.  A framework for interpreting recency effects in immediate serial recall.

Authors:  J S Nairne
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1988-07

5.  Set-size effects in primary memory: an age-related capacity limitation?

Authors:  G S Halford; M T Maybery; J D Bain
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1988-09

6.  Grouping and short-term memory: different means and patterns of grouping.

Authors:  J Ryan
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 2.143

7.  Retrieval plus scanning: does it occur?

Authors:  S Brannelly; G Tehan; M S Humphreys
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1989-11

8.  Phonemic-similarity effects in good vs. poor readers.

Authors:  J W Hall; K P Wilson; M S Humphreys; M B Tinzmann; P M Bowyer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1983-09

9.  The demise of short-term memory.

Authors:  R G Crowder
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1982-07

10.  Short-term memory capacity: magic number or magic spell?

Authors:  R Schweickert; B Boruff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  17 in total

1.  Reversing the phonological similarity effect.

Authors:  J S Nairne; M R Kelley
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-01

2.  Target similarity effects: support for the parallel distributed processing assumptions.

Authors:  M S Humphreys; G Tehan; A O'Shea; S W Bolland
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-07

3.  Temporal grouping in auditory spatial serial memory.

Authors:  Fabrice B R Parmentier; Murray T Maybery; Dylan M Jones
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-06

Review 4.  Modeling working memory: an interference model of complex span.

Authors:  Klaus Oberauer; Stephan Lewandowsky; Simon Farrell; Christopher Jarrold; Martin Greaves
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-10

5.  Modulating the phonological similarity effect: the contribution of interlist similarity and lexicality.

Authors:  Paul Johan Karlsen; Arild Lian
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-04

6.  Semantic similarity and immediate serial recall: is there an effect on all trials?

Authors:  Jean Saint-Aubin; Denis Ouellette; Marie Poirier
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-02

7.  On the capacity of attention: its estimation and its role in working memory and cognitive aptitudes.

Authors:  Nelson Cowan; Emily M Elliott; J Scott Saults; Candice C Morey; Sam Mattox; Anna Hismjatullina; Andrew R A Conway
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2005-03-02       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Proactive interference and cuing effects in short-term cued recall: does foil context matter?

Authors:  Winston D Goh; Huiqin Tan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-07

9.  Age and redintegration in immediate memory and their relationship to task difficulty.

Authors:  Kerry Neale; Gerald Tehan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-12

10.  Interference between storage and processing in working memory: Feature overwriting, not similarity-based competition.

Authors:  Klaus Oberauer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.