Literature DB >> 11126935

The phonological similarity effect in immediate recall: positions of shared phonemes.

X Li1, R Schweickert, J Gandour.   

Abstract

Earlier literature proposes two ways phonological similarity could harm immediate recall: (1) It could increase the degradation of the representations of items in memory, or (2) it could decrease the probability that a degraded representation is correctly reconstructed. A multinomial processing tree model for each hypothesis was used to analyze an immediate recall experiment. Both gave a good account of the data, but, of the two, results favor the hypothesis that the effect of phonological similarity is to impair reconstruction of degraded representations. A second issue is whether positions of repeated phonemes in phonologically similar items matter. We found that mere repetition of phonemes produced a phonological similarity effect. Repeated phonemes in the same positions appeared to produce a greater effect. A final finding is that when reading rate was preequated, phonological similarity affected memory span by changing the time taken to recall a list of span length.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11126935     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211813

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  15 in total

1.  Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling.

Authors:  W H Batchelder; D M Riefer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-03

2.  Phonotactic influences on short-term memory.

Authors:  S E Gathercole; C R Frankish; S J Pickering; S Peaker
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Creating proactive interference in immediate recall: building a dog from a dart, a mop, and a fig.

Authors:  G Tehan; M S Humphreys
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-05

Review 4.  A feature model of immediate memory.

Authors:  J S Nairne
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1990-05

5.  Output loss or rehearsal loop? Output-time versus pronunciation-time limits in immediate recall for forgetting-matched materials.

Authors:  B A Dosher; J J Ma
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Acoustic similarity and interference in short-term recognition memory: some results of a decision-theory analysis.

Authors:  J D Ingleby
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 2.143

Review 7.  A multinomial processing tree model for degradation and redintegration in immediate recall.

Authors:  R Schweickert
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1993-03

8.  Effects of generation on immediate memory span and delayed unexpected free recall.

Authors:  R Schweickert; M A McDaniel; G Riegler
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1994-08

9.  On the role of interference in short-term retention.

Authors:  M I Posner; A F Konick
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1966-08

10.  Short-term memory capacity: magic number or magic spell?

Authors:  R Schweickert; B Boruff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  3 in total

1.  All parts of an item are not equal: effects of phonological redundancy on immediate recall.

Authors:  Elisabet Service; Sini Maury
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-03

2.  Decomposing serial learning: what is missing from the learning curve?

Authors:  Kelly M Addis; Michael J Kahana
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-02

3.  The involvement of occipital and inferior frontal cortex in the phonological learning of Chinese characters.

Authors:  Yuan Deng; Tai-li Chou; Guo-sheng Ding; Dan-ling Peng; James R Booth
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 3.225

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.