Literature DB >> 7543639

Patient reactions to a program designed to facilitate patient participation in treatment decisions for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

M J Barry1, F J Fowler, A G Mulley, J V Henderson, J E Wennberg.   

Abstract

Patients often want considerable information about their conditions, and enhanced patient participation might reduce unwanted practice variation and improve medical decisions. The authors assessed how men with benign prostatic hyperplasia reacted to an education program designed to facilitate participation in decisionmaking, and how strongly ratings of their symptom state and the prospect of complications predicted their treatment choice. A prospective cohort study was conducted in three hospital-based urology practices: two in prepaid group practices, and one Veterans Administration clinic. Four hundred twenty-one men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia without prior prostatectomy or benign prostatic hyperplasia complications were enrolled, and 373 provided usable ratings. Subjects participated in an interactive videodisc-based shared decisionmaking program about benign prostatic hyperplasia and its treatment options, prostatectomy, and "watchful waiting." They rated the length, clarity, balance, and value of the program and were followed for 3 months to determine if they underwent surgery. Patients rated the program as generally clear, informative, and balanced. Across all three sites, 77% of patients were very positive and 16% were generally positive about the program's usefulness in making a treatment decision. Logistic models predicting choice of surgical treatment documented the independent importance of negative ratings of the current symptom state (odds ratio 7.0, 95% confidence interval 2.9-16.6), as well as the prospect of postoperative sexual dysfunction (odds ratio 0.20, 95% confidence interval 0.08-0.48) in decisionmaking. Patients rated the Shared Decisionmaking Program very positively and made decisions consistent with their assessed preferences. These results suggest that patients can be helped to participate in treatment decisions, and support a randomized trial of the Shared Decisionmaking Program.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7543639     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199508000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  81 in total

1.  Clustering and the design of preference-assessment surveys in healthcare.

Authors:  A Lin; L A Lenert; M A Hlatky; K M McDonald; R A Olshen; J Hornberger
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Perceptions of benefit and risk of patients undergoing first-time elective percutaneous coronary revascularization.

Authors:  E S Holmboe; D A Fiellin; E Cusanelli; M Remetz; H M Krumholz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Medical decision-making among Hispanics and non-Hispanic Whites with chronic back and knee pain: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Katz; Nancy Lyons; Lisa S Wolff; Jodie Silverman; Parastu Emrani; Holly L Holt; Kelly L Corbett; Agustin Escalante; Elena Losina
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  New pathways for primary care: an update on primary care programs from the innovation center at CMS.

Authors:  Richard J Baron
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  The role of public opinion in drug resource allocation decisions.

Authors:  C A Melfi; B G Drake; W M Tierney
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  A conceptual framework for interprofessional shared decision making in home care: protocol for a feasibility study.

Authors:  France Légaré; Dawn Stacey; Nathalie Brière; Sophie Desroches; Serge Dumont; Kimberley Fraser; Mary-Anne Murray; Anne Sales; Denise Aubé
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Factors influencing behavioral intention regarding prostate cancer screening among older African-American men.

Authors:  Marvella E Ford; Sally W Vernon; Suzanne L Havstad; Shirley A Thomas; Shawna D Davis
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.798

8.  Evidence-based patient choice: a prostate cancer decision aid in plain language.

Authors:  Margaret Holmes-Rovner; Sue Stableford; Angela Fagerlin; John T Wei; Rodney L Dunn; Janet Ohene-Frempong; Karen Kelly-Blake; David R Rovner
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2005-06-20       Impact factor: 2.796

9.  Medical Necessity and the Debate over [Expletive Deleted] Care.

Authors:  John E Wennberg
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.792

10.  Informing patients: a guide for providing patient health information.

Authors:  P C Tang; C Newcomb
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.