OBJECTIVE: Nonverbal and verbal communication elements enhance and reinforce the consent form in the informed consent process and need to be transferred appropriately to multimedia formats using interaction design when re-designing the process. METHODS: Observational, question asking behavior, and content analyses were used to analyze nonverbal and verbal elements of an informed consent process. RESULTS: A variety of gestures, interruptions, and communication styles were observed. CONCLUSION: In converting a verbal conversation about a textual document to multimedia formats, all aspects of the original process including verbal and nonverbal variation should be one part of an interaction community-centered design approach.
OBJECTIVE: Nonverbal and verbal communication elements enhance and reinforce the consent form in the informed consent process and need to be transferred appropriately to multimedia formats using interaction design when re-designing the process. METHODS: Observational, question asking behavior, and content analyses were used to analyze nonverbal and verbal elements of an informed consent process. RESULTS: A variety of gestures, interruptions, and communication styles were observed. CONCLUSION: In converting a verbal conversation about a textual document to multimedia formats, all aspects of the original process including verbal and nonverbal variation should be one part of an interaction community-centered design approach.
Authors: Muta M Issa; Erin Setzer; Christine Charaf; Alexandra L B Webb; Rachel Derico; I Jane Kimberl; Aaron S Fink Journal: J Urol Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Michael J Green; Susan K Peterson; Maria Wagner Baker; Lois C Friedman; Gregory R Harper; Wendy S Rubinstein; June A Peters; David T Mauger Journal: Genet Med Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Andrea N Mahnke; Joseph M Plasek; David G Hoffman; Nathan S Partridge; Wendy S Foth; Carol J Waudby; Luke V Rasmussen; Valerie D McManus; Catherine A McCarty Journal: Am J Med Genet A Date: 2013-11-22 Impact factor: 2.802