Literature DB >> 2296494

Readability of pediatric biomedical research informed consent forms.

K J Tarnowski1, D M Allen, C Mayhall, P A Kelly.   

Abstract

Informed consent forms are used in biomedical research as a mechanism to convey study information to potential subjects so that they may arrive at a decision concerning their willingness to participate. Although the Department of Health and Human Services Regulations for the Protection of Human Subjects require the presentation of specific study information at a level that is easily understood, according to research concerning adult biomedical consent forms, the typical form is not readily comprehensible. Unfortunately, no data exist concerning the readability of informed consent forms that are used in the context of pediatric biomedical research. In the present study, readability analyses were conducted on a large sample (N = 238) of pediatric biomedical informed consent forms obtained during a 10-year period from a large midwestern children's hospital. For the entire sample, results derived from two readability estimates (Fry grade equivalent and Flesch Reading Ease methods) indicated that the consent forms were written at the college graduate level. Although there was a linear increase in the length of the consent document during the 10-year period evaluated, expanded length was not associated with improved readability. According to analyses, a differential pattern of reading difficulty was associated with specific sections of the informed consent document. Findings are highly consistent with those from studies of adult biomedical consent form and document that the purpose of the informed consent form is being compromised, in part, by a readability factor. Suggestions for solving this critical problem are advanced.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Columbus Children's Hospital (OH)

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2296494

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  26 in total

Review 1.  The promise of empirical research in the study of informed consent theory and practice.

Authors:  Laura A Siminoff; Marie Caputo; Christopher Burant
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2004-03

2.  Assessing the readability of ClinicalTrials.gov.

Authors:  Danny T Y Wu; David A Hanauer; Qiaozhu Mei; Patricia M Clark; Lawrence C An; Joshua Proulx; Qing T Zeng; V G Vinod Vydiswaran; Kevyn Collins-Thompson; Kai Zheng
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Variation in the readability of items within surveys.

Authors:  José L Calderón; Leo S Morales; Honghu Liu; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.852

4.  The use of multimedia in the informed consent process.

Authors:  H B Jimison; P P Sher; R Appleyard; Y LeVernois
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 5.  Clinical trials in children.

Authors:  Pathma D Joseph; Jonathan C Craig; Patrina H Y Caldwell
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  A pilot study of the quality of informed consent materials for Aboriginal participants in clinical trials.

Authors:  F M Russell; J R Carapetis; H Liddle; T Edwards; T A Ruff; J Devitt
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.903

7.  Informed consent, parental awareness, and reasons for participating in a randomised controlled study.

Authors:  M van Stuijvenberg; M H Suur; S de Vos; G C Tjiang; E W Steyerberg; G Derksen-Lubsen; H A Moll
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  The readability of information and consent forms in clinical research in France.

Authors:  Véronique Ménoni; Noël Lucas; Jean François Leforestier; Jérôme Dimet; François Doz; Gilles Chatellier; Jean-Marc Tréluyer; Hélène Chappuy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Consent timing and experience: modifiable factors that may influence interest in clinical research.

Authors:  David E Gerber; Drew W Rasco; Celette Sugg Skinner; Jonathan E Dowell; Jingsheng Yan; Jennifer R Sayne; Yang Xie
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 3.840

10.  Informing the uninformed: optimizing the consent message using a fractional factorial design.

Authors:  Alan R Tait; Terri Voepel-Lewis; Vijayan N Nair; Naveen N Narisetty; Angela Fagerlin
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 16.193

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.