Literature DB >> 9609328

The relationship of body mass index to intra-abdominal pressure as measured by multichannel cystometry.

K L Noblett1, J K Jensen, D R Ostergard.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to identify the possible relationship between body mass index and intra-abdominal pressure as measured by multichannel cystometry. A retrospective chart review of patients presenting for urodynamic evaluation between January 1995 and March 1996 was carried out. Variables identified included weight, height, intra-abdominal pressure and intravesical pressure as recorded on multi-channel cystometrogram at first sensation in the absence of detrusor activity. Body mass index was defined as weight in kilograms divided by height in square meters. Intra-abdominal pressure was measured intravaginally except in those cases of complete procidentia or severe prolapse, where it was measured transrectally. Adequate data were available on 136 patients. The mean age was 60.6 years (range 30-91); mean body mass index was 27.7 kg/m2 (range 12.7-47.7); and mean intra-abdominal pressure was 27.5 cmH2O (range 9.0-48.0). A strong association between intra-abdominal pressure and body mass index was demonstrated, with a Pearson coefficient correlation value of 0.76 (P<0.0001). Strong correlation was still demonstrated when those patients who had had the intra-abdominal pressure measured transrectally were separated out, thus eliminating any possible confounding factors between measurements of intra-abdominal pressure measured transvaginally versus transrectally. In addition a strong correlation between intravesical pressure and body mass index was also demonstrated, with a Pearson coefficient correlation value of 0.71 (P<0.0001). Of the 136 patients, 65 (47.8%) were ultimately diagnosed as having genuine stress urinary incontinence (GSUI), 35 (25.7%) with GSUI and a low-pressure urethra (maximum urethral closure pressure of less than 20 cmH2O), and 18 (13.2%) with detrusor instability. The remaining 13.2% had severe prolapse. Our data demonstrate a significant correlation between body mass index and intra-abdominal pressure. These findings suggest that obesity may stress the pelvic floor secondary to chronic state of increased pressure, and may represent a mechanism which supports the widely held belief that obesity is a common factor in the development and recurrence of GSUI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9609328     DOI: 10.1007/bf02765589

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct


  14 in total

1.  Obesity and lower urinary tract function in women: effect of surgically induced weight loss.

Authors:  R C Bump; H J Sugerman; J A Fantl; D K McClish
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Gynecologic-obstetric changes after loss of massive excess weight following bariatric surgery.

Authors:  M Deitel; E Stone; H A Kassam; E J Wilk; D J Sutherland
Journal:  J Am Coll Nutr       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Intravaginal pressure recording as alternative to intrarectal pressure monitoring.

Authors:  R L Vereecken
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  The vagina as an alternative to the rectum in measuring abdominal pressure during urodynamic investigations.

Authors:  E D James; P G Niblett; J A MacNaughton; C Shaldon
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1987-09

5.  Urodynamic appraisal of vaginal versus rectal pressure recordings as indication of intra-abdominal pressure changes.

Authors:  N N Bhatia; A Bergman
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Obesity and urinary incontinence in women.

Authors:  P L Dwyer; E T Lee; D M Hay
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1988-01

7.  Use of vaginal pressure measurements in urodynamic testing.

Authors:  D A Richardson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Obesity and stress urinary incontinence: significance of indices of relative weight.

Authors:  H Kölbl; P Riss
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.089

9.  Factors associated with urinary incontinence in women.

Authors:  J W Yarnell; G J Voyle; P M Sweetnam; J Milbank; C J Richards; T P Stephenson
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  Are vaginal and rectal pressures equivalent approximations of one another for the purpose of performing subtracted cystometry?

Authors:  L L Wall; J K Hewitt; M J Helms
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  75 in total

1.  Outcome of tension-free obturator tape procedures in obese and overweight women.

Authors:  Po-En Liu; Chin-Hui Su; Hui-Hsuan Lau; Ru-Jhu Chang; Wen-Chu Huang; Tsung-Hsien Su
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Influence of TVT properties on outcomes of midurethral sling procedures: high-stiffness versus low-stiffness tape.

Authors:  Jens Christian Prien-Larsen; Thomas Prien-Larsen; Lars Cieslak; Ram B Dessau
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  The Impact of Central Obesity on Storage Luts and Urinary Incontinence After Prostatic Surgery.

Authors:  Mauro Gacci; Arcangelo Sebastianelli; Matteo Salvi; Cosimo De Nunzio; Andrea Tubaro; Stavros Gravas; Ignacio Moncada; Sergio Serni; Mario Maggi; Linda Vignozzi
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Incontinence surgery in obese women: comparative analysis of short- and long-term outcomes with a transobturator sling.

Authors:  Inês Pereira; Alexandre Valentim-Lourenço; Catarina Castro; Inês Martins; Alexandra Henriques; Ana Luísa Ribeirinho
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Variables Affecting Intra-abdominal Pressure During Lifting in the Early Postpartum Period.

Authors:  Yvonne Hsu; Robert Hitchcock; Stefan Niederauer; Ingrid E Nygaard; Janet M Shaw; Xiaoming Sheng
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2018 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 2.091

6.  Weight and urinary incontinence: the missing links.

Authors:  Stian Langeland Wesnes
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Multiparity, age and overweight/obesity as risk factors for urinary incontinence in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Leila Barbosa; Alessandra Boaviagem; Eduarda Moretti; Andrea Lemos
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-05-12       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Risk factors for fecal incontinence in older women.

Authors:  Mary K Townsend; Catherine A Matthews; William E Whitehead; Francine Grodstein
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Vaginal pressure during lifting, floor exercises, jogging, and use of hydraulic exercise machines.

Authors:  Katharine K O'Dell; Abraham N Morse; Sybil L Crawford; Allison Howard
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-05-22

10.  The impact of obesity on urinary incontinence symptoms, severity, urodynamic characteristics and quality of life.

Authors:  Holly E Richter; Kimberly Kenton; Liyuan Huang; Ingrid Nygaard; Stephen Kraus; Emily Whitcomb; Toby C Chai; Gary Lemack; Larry Sirls; Kimberly J Dandreo; Anne Stoddard
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 7.450

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.