Literature DB >> 3705289

Urodynamic appraisal of vaginal versus rectal pressure recordings as indication of intra-abdominal pressure changes.

N N Bhatia, A Bergman.   

Abstract

To compare intravaginal versus intrarectal pressure recordings as an indication of intra-abdominal pressure changes, simultaneous recording of the vaginal, bladder, and rectal pressures were obtained in 20 women. The transmitted pressure changes recorded from the inner and middle thirds of the vagina strongly correlated with the transmitted pressure changes recorded from the bladder (r = 0.99) when compared with the observed correlation between bladder and rectal pressure recordings (r = 0.91). The vaginal pressure recording is an easier and accurate alternative to intrarectal pressure recordings for approximating abdominal pressure changes during urodynamic testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3705289     DOI: 10.1016/0090-4295(86)90424-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  5 in total

1.  The relationship of body mass index to intra-abdominal pressure as measured by multichannel cystometry.

Authors:  K L Noblett; J K Jensen; D R Ostergard
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  1997

2.  Leak point pressure does not correlate with incontinence severity or bother in women undergoing surgery for urodynamic stress incontinence.

Authors:  Chi Chiung Grace Chen; Christopher M Rooney; Marie Fidela R Paraiso; Steven D Kleeman; Mark D Walters; Mickey M Karram; Matthew D Barber
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-04-15

3.  Design and development of a novel intra-vaginal pressure sensor.

Authors:  Jennifer Kruger; Lynsey Hayward; Poul Nielsen; Denis Loiselle; Robert Kirton
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Clinical evaluation of a high-fidelity wireless intravaginal pressure sensor.

Authors:  Anuprita S Arora; Jennifer A Kruger; David M Budgett; Lynsey M Hayward; Jackie Smalldridge; Poul F Nielsen; Robert S Kirton
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 5.  A comparison of external transducers and microtransducers in urodynamic studies of female patients.

Authors:  Peter M Lotze
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.862

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.