Literature DB >> 3676664

The vagina as an alternative to the rectum in measuring abdominal pressure during urodynamic investigations.

E D James1, P G Niblett, J A MacNaughton, C Shaldon.   

Abstract

Pressure in the vagina as well as within the bladder and rectum was measured during urodynamic investigations. Rectal pressure is normally used to represent changes in abdominal pressure which, when subtracted from the total bladder pressure, provides a method of assessing detrusor function. This study showed that vaginal pressure represented changes in abdominal pressure more accurately and consistently than did rectal pressure, and the vagina is therefore recommended as an alternative site in conducting urodynamic studies.

Mesh：

Year:  1987        PMID： 3676664     DOI： 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1987.tb05485.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Urol        ISSN： 0007-1331


  11 in total

1.  The relationship of body mass index to intra-abdominal pressure as measured by multichannel cystometry.

Authors:  K L Noblett; J K Jensen; D R Ostergard
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  1997

2.  More complicated than it looks: the vagaries of calculating intra-abdominal pressure.

Authors:  Nadia M Hamad; Janet M Shaw; Ingrid E Nygaard; Tanner J Coleman; Yvonne Hsu; Marlene Egger; Robert W Hitchcock
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  The effect of abdominal and pelvic floor muscle activation patterns on urethral pressure.

Authors:  Ruth R Sapsford; Barton Clarke; Paul W Hodges
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  The Relationship Between Intra-Abdominal Pressure and Body Acceleration During Exercise.

Authors:  Johanna Day de Gennaro; Claire K de Gennaro; Janet M Shaw; Tomasz J Petelenz; Ingrid E Nygaard; Robert W Hitchcock
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 2.091

5.  Six-element sensor for measuring vaginal pressure profiles.

Authors:  T D Whyte; D S McNally; E D James
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Reproducibility of intra-abdominal pressure measured during physical activities via a wireless vaginal transducer.

Authors:  Marlene J Egger; Nadia M Hamad; Robert W Hitchcock; Tanner J Coleman; Janet M Shaw; Yvonne Hsu; Ingrid E Nygaard
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.091

7.  A Common Molecular Switch for H2S to Regulate Multiple Protein Targets.

Authors:  Bei-Bei Tao; Yi-Chun Zhu
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

8.  Intra-abdominal pressures during activity in women using an intra-vaginal pressure transducer.

Authors:  Janet M Shaw; Nadia M Hamad; Tanner J Coleman; Marlene J Egger; Yvonne Hsu; Robert Hitchcock; Ingrid E Nygaard
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.337

9.  Development and testing of a vaginal pressure sensor to measure intra-abdominal pressure in women.

Authors:  Evan M Rosenbluth; Paul J Johnson; Robert W Hitchcock; Ingrid E Nygaard
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.696

10.  Leak point pressure does not correlate with incontinence severity or bother in women undergoing surgery for urodynamic stress incontinence.

Authors:  Chi Chiung Grace Chen; Christopher M Rooney; Marie Fidela R Paraiso; Steven D Kleeman; Mark D Walters; Mickey M Karram; Matthew D Barber
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-04-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.