PURPOSE: We compared urinary incontinence severity measures and the impact of stress urinary incontinence in normal, overweight and obese women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Baseline characteristics of subjects in the SISTEr (655) and the TOMUS (597) were analyzed. Body mass index was defined as normal (less than 25 kg/m(2)), overweight (25 to less than 30 kg/m(2)) and obese (30 kg/m(2) or greater). Independent urinary incontinence severity measures included a 3-day diary including incontinence episode frequency, Urogenital Distress Inventory scores and Valsalva leak point pressure from urodynamic testing. Impact was measured using the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire. Multivariable regression models were fit for each severity measure (Urogenital Distress Inventory, incontinence episode frequency, Valsalva leak point pressure and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire) on weight category. Covariates included age, race, diabetes and variables significantly associated with body mass index on bivariate analysis. RESULTS: Mean age (SD) of participants was 51.9 (10.3) in SISTEr and 52.9 (11.0) in TOMUS. In each trial 45% of subjects were obese. In SISTEr multivariable regression analyses showed that higher weight category was independently associated with higher mean Urogenital Distress Inventory score (p = 0.003), incontinence episode frequency (p <0.0001), Valsalva leak point pressure (p = 0.003) and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire score (p = 0.0004). In TOMUS higher weight category was not associated with Urogenital Distress Inventory score (p = 0.24) but was associated with higher incontinence episode frequency (p = 0.0003), Valsalva leak point pressure (p = 0.0006) and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire score (p <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Obese women undergoing surgery for stress urinary incontinence report more incontinence episodes, more symptom distress and worse quality of life despite better measure of urethral function (higher Valsalva leak point pressure) on urodynamics. Copyright 2010 American Urological Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PURPOSE: We compared urinary incontinence severity measures and the impact of stress urinary incontinence in normal, overweight and obesewomen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Baseline characteristics of subjects in the SISTEr (655) and the TOMUS (597) were analyzed. Body mass index was defined as normal (less than 25 kg/m(2)), overweight (25 to less than 30 kg/m(2)) and obese (30 kg/m(2) or greater). Independent urinary incontinence severity measures included a 3-day diary including incontinence episode frequency, Urogenital Distress Inventory scores and Valsalva leak point pressure from urodynamic testing. Impact was measured using the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire. Multivariable regression models were fit for each severity measure (Urogenital Distress Inventory, incontinence episode frequency, Valsalva leak point pressure and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire) on weight category. Covariates included age, race, diabetes and variables significantly associated with body mass index on bivariate analysis. RESULTS: Mean age (SD) of participants was 51.9 (10.3) in SISTEr and 52.9 (11.0) in TOMUS. In each trial 45% of subjects were obese. In SISTEr multivariable regression analyses showed that higher weight category was independently associated with higher mean Urogenital Distress Inventory score (p = 0.003), incontinence episode frequency (p <0.0001), Valsalva leak point pressure (p = 0.003) and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire score (p = 0.0004). In TOMUS higher weight category was not associated with Urogenital Distress Inventory score (p = 0.24) but was associated with higher incontinence episode frequency (p = 0.0003), Valsalva leak point pressure (p = 0.0006) and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire score (p <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS:Obesewomen undergoing surgery for stress urinary incontinence report more incontinence episodes, more symptom distress and worse quality of life despite better measure of urethral function (higher Valsalva leak point pressure) on urodynamics. Copyright 2010 American Urological Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Charles W Nager; Michael E Albo; Mary P Fitzgerald; Susan M McDermott; Stephen Kraus; Holly E Richter; Philippe Zimmern Journal: Urology Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Cynthia L Ogden; Margaret D Carroll; Lester R Curtin; Margaret A McDowell; Carolyn J Tabak; Katherine M Flegal Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-04-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Gary E Lemack; Yan Xu; Linda Brubaker; Charles Nager; Toby Chai; Pamela Moalli; Stephen R Kraus; Lindsey Kerr; Larry Sirls; Anne Stoddard Journal: Neurourol Urodyn Date: 2007 Impact factor: 2.696
Authors: Holly E Richter; Kathryn L Burgio; Ronald H Clements; Patricia S Goode; David T Redden; R Edward Varner Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Leslee L Subak; Rena Wing; Delia Smith West; Frank Franklin; Eric Vittinghoff; Jennifer M Creasman; Holly E Richter; Deborah Myers; Kathryn L Burgio; Amy A Gorin; Judith Macer; John W Kusek; Deborah Grady Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-01-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Christina Lewicky-Gaupp; John T Wei; John O L Delancey; Dee E Fenner; Edward J McGuire; Daniel M Morgan Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2008-10-30 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Carolyn W Swenson; Giselle E Kolenic; Elisa R Trowbridge; Mitchell B Berger; Christina Lewicky-Gaupp; Rebecca U Margulies; Daniel M Morgan; Dee E Fenner; John O DeLancey Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Toby C Chai; Liyuan Huang; Kim Kenton; Holly E Richter; Jan Baker; Stephen Kraus; Heather Litman Journal: Neurourol Urodyn Date: 2012-02-29 Impact factor: 2.696
Authors: Anne M Suskind; Peggy M Cawthon; Sanae Nakagawa; Leslee L Subak; Ilse Reinders; Suzanne Satterfield; Steve Cummings; Jane A Cauley; Tamara Harris; Alison J Huang Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2016-12-05 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Yvonne Hsu; Robert Hitchcock; Stefan Niederauer; Ingrid E Nygaard; Janet M Shaw; Xiaoming Sheng Journal: Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg Date: 2018 Jul/Aug Impact factor: 2.091
Authors: David R Ellington; Michael R Polin; Jeff M Szychowski; Luqin Deng; Holly E Richter Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2013-05-04 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Luiz O Leiria; Carolina Sollon; Fernando R Báu; Fabíola Z Mónica; Carlos L D'Ancona; Gilberto De Nucci; Andrew D Grant; Gabriel F Anhê; Edson Antunes Journal: J Physiol Date: 2013-03-11 Impact factor: 5.182