Literature DB >> 9604348

Auditory filter nonlinearity at 2 kHz in normal hearing listeners.

S Rosen1, R J Baker, A Darling.   

Abstract

Auditory filters broaden with increasing level. Using a recently developed method of fitting filter shapes to notched-noise masking data that explicitly models the nonlinear changes in filter shape across level, results at 2 kHz from 9 listeners over a wide range of levels and notch widths are reported. Families of roex(p,w,t) filter shapes lead to models which account well for the observed data. The primary effect of level is a broadening in the tails of the filter as level increases. In all cases, models with filter parameters depending on probe level fit the data much better than masker-dependent models. Thus auditory filter shapes appear to be controlled by their output, not by their input. Notched-noise tests, if performed at a single level, should use a fixed probe level. Filter shapes derived in this way, and normalized to have equal tail gain, are highly reminiscent of measurements made directly on the basilar membrane, including the degree of compression evidenced in the input-output function.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9604348     DOI: 10.1121/1.422775

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  25 in total

1.  The empirical characteristics of human pattern vision defy theoretically-driven expectations.

Authors:  Peter Neri
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 4.475

2.  The effect of sound intensity on the frequency resolving power of hearing and the effect of interference.

Authors:  A Ya Supin; V V Popov; O N Milekhina; M B Tarakanov
Journal:  Dokl Biol Sci       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr

3.  Estimates of human cochlear tuning at low levels using forward and simultaneous masking.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-07-10

4.  Isoresponse versus isoinput estimates of cochlear filter tuning.

Authors:  Almudena Eustaquio-Martín; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-11-23

5.  Auditory-filter characteristics for listeners with real and simulated hearing impairment.

Authors:  Joseph G Desloge; Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida; Zachary D Perez; Lorraine A Delhorne
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2012-03

Review 6.  Some problems in the measurement of the frequency-resolving ability of hearing.

Authors:  A Ya Supin
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-10

7.  Psychophysical estimates of nonlinear cochlear processing in younger and older listeners.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Level dependence of auditory filters in nonsimultaneous masking as a function of frequency.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Andrea M Simonson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 9.  Basic auditory processes involved in the analysis of speech sounds.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Auditory filter tuning inferred with short sinusoidal and notched-noise maskers.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.