Literature DB >> 9604099

Attentional selection by distractor suppression.

G Caputo1, S Guerra.   

Abstract

Selective attention was studied in displays containing singletons popping out for their odd form or color. The target was defined as the form-singleton, the distractor as the color-singleton. The task was to discriminate the length of a longer line inside the target. Target-distractor similarity was controlled using a threshold measurement as dependent variable in experiments in which distractor presence vs absence, bottom-up vs top-down selection (through knowledge of target features), and target-distractor distance were manipulated. The results in the bottom-up condition showed that length threshold was elevated when a distractor was present and that this elevation progressively increased as the number of distractors was increased from one to two. This set-size effect was not accounted by the hypothesis that selective attention intervenes only at the stage of decision before response. Selective attention produced a suppressive surround in which discriminability of neighboring objects was strongly reduced, and a larger surround in which discriminability was reduced by an approximately constant amount. Different results were found in the top-down condition in which target discriminability was unaffected by distractor presence and no effect of target-distractor distance was found. On the other hand, response times in both bottom-up and top-down conditions were slower the shorter the target-distractor distance was. On the basis of the experimental results, selective attention is a parallel process of spatial filtering at an intermediate processing level operating after objects have been segmented. This filtering stage explores high level interactions between objects taking control on combinatorial explosion by operating over only a limited spatial extent: it picks out a selected object and inhibits the neighboring objects; then, non-selected objects are suppressed across the overall image. When no feature-based selection is available in the current behavior, this filtering influences perception in decreasing discriminability of non-selected objects. When feature-based selection is available, spatial interactions are set before stimulus arrival, hence only the unmatching objects have their discriminability diminished.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9604099     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00189-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  20 in total

1.  Attentional capture modulates perceptual sensitivity.

Authors:  Jan Theeuwes; Arthur F Kramer; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-06

Review 2.  Visual attention as a multilevel selection process.

Authors:  Sabine Kastner; Mark A Pinsk
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Direct neurophysiological evidence for spatial suppression surrounding the focus of attention in vision.

Authors:  J-M Hopf; C N Boehler; S J Luck; J K Tsotsos; H-J Heinze; M A Schoenfeld
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Cortical and subcortical predictive dynamics and learning during perception, cognition, emotion and action.

Authors:  Stephen Grossberg
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Searching for two feature singletons in the visual scene: the localized attentional interference effect.

Authors:  Ping Wei; Jianguo Lü; Hermann J Müller; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-06       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Enhanced distraction by magnocellular salience signals in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Carly J Leonard; Benjamin M Robinson; Britta Hahn; James M Gold; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Spatially Guided Distractor Suppression during Visual Search.

Authors:  Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld; Marina Weinberger; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Attentional selection within and across hemispheres: implications for the perceptual load theory.

Authors:  Ping Wei; Guanlan Kang; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The attentional effects of single cues and color singletons on visual sensitivity.

Authors:  Alex L White; Rasmus Lunau; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Priming and intrusion errors in RSVP streams with two response dimensions.

Authors:  Daniel Loach; Juan Botella; Jesús Privado; John K Tsotsos
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2007-05-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.