Literature DB >> 17534656

Priming and intrusion errors in RSVP streams with two response dimensions.

Daniel Loach1, Juan Botella, Jesús Privado, John K Tsotsos.   

Abstract

Loach and Marí-Beffa (Vis Cogn, 10:513-526, 2003) observed that a distractor stimulus, presented immediately after a behaviorally relevant target stimulus, negatively primed a related probe stimulus indicating that the distractor had been inhibited. They argued that "post-target inhibition" may be a mechanism for preventing interference from temporally proximal stimuli; interference that could potentially result in a binding/intrusion error. In order to test this hypothesis, the authors carried out two rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) experiments in which participants had to report either the identity (Experiment 1) or color (Experiment 2) of a target letter surrounded by distractor letters. In Experiment 1, a close relationship between priming and errors was observed. When a distractor stimulus showed evidence of being inhibited the participant was less likely to commit a binding error. The opposite was true when a distractor stimulus showed evidence of being facilitated. The results of Experiment 2 showed limited evidence of the same relationship.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17534656     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-007-0116-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  17 in total

1.  The time course of competition for attention: attention is initially labile.

Authors:  Mary C Potter; Adrian Staub; Daniel H O'Connor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  The selective tuning model of attention: psychophysical evidence for a suppressive annulus around an attended item.

Authors:  Florin Cutzu; John K Tsotsos
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  The attentional 'spotlight's' penumbra: center-surround modulation in striate cortex.

Authors:  Notger G Müller; Andreas Kleinschmidt
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2004-04-29       Impact factor: 1.837

4.  The attentional blink: resource depletion or temporary loss of control?

Authors:  Vincent Di Lollo; Jun-ichiro Kawahara; S M Shahab Ghorashi; James T Enns
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-04-29

5.  The simultaneous type, serial token model of temporal attention and working memory.

Authors:  Howard Bowman; Brad Wyble
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Allocation of attention in the visual field.

Authors:  C W Eriksen; Y Y Yeh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: a zoom lens model.

Authors:  C W Eriksen; J D St James
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-10

8.  Repetition blindness: type recognition without token individuation.

Authors:  N G Kanwisher
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1987-11

Review 9.  Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory.

Authors:  H Pashler
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 17.737

10.  Attention and the detection of signals.

Authors:  M I Posner; C R Snyder; B J Davidson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-06
View more
  1 in total

1.  Differences in the strength of distractor inhibition do not affect distractor-response bindings.

Authors:  Carina Giesen; Christian Frings; Klaus Rothermund
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-04
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.