Literature DB >> 9600776

Impact of spatial resolution on the prediction of trabecular architecture parameters.

M Kothari1, T M Keaveny, J C Lin, D C Newitt, H K Genant, S Majumdar.   

Abstract

Although the efficacy of various measures for the assessment of trabecular bone architecture has been widely studied, the impact of spatial resolution on the estimation of these measures has remained relatively unexplored. In this study, ten cubes each of human trabecular bone from the femur and vertebral bodies were obtained from nine cadavers (four males and five females), aged 23-67 years (mean 42.3 years). These specimens were serially milled and imaged at a resolution of 40 microm to produce three-dimensional digitizations from which traditional morphometric and structural anisotropy measures could be computed based on a three-dimensional approach. The cubes were then artificially degraded to an in-plane resolution of 100 microm and an out-of-plane (slice) resolution of 100-1000 microm. These resolutions mimicked in vivo resolutions as seen using magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. All images, original and degraded, were individually segmented using a thresholding algorithm, and both the traditional morphometric and structural anisotropy measures were recomputed. The choice of slice direction was varied along the superior-inferior (axial), anterior-posterior (coronal), and medial-lateral (sagittal) directions to minimize the impact of the lower slice resolution on the architectural measures. It was found that traditional morphometric measures such as trabecular spacing and trabecular number showed weak resolution dependency; measures such as trabecular thickness, however, showed strong resolution dependency and required very high resolutions for precise measurement. In the case of the femur specimens, both structural anisotropy as well as the preferred orientation showed a strong resolution dependency. The resolution dependency of these parameters could be minimized for the femur and the vertebral body specimens if the slice direction was taken along the superior-inferior direction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Non-programmatic

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9600776     DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(98)00031-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  31 in total

1.  The importance of the endplate for interbody cages in the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Anne Polikeit; Stephen J Ferguson; Lutz P Nolte; Tracy E Orr
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-05-29       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Combination of 3D MRI and connectivity analysis in structural evaluation of cancellous bone in rat proximal femur.

Authors:  J Timonen; K Kippo; R Glantz; T Pakkanen
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Methodological considerations for analyzing trabecular architecture: an example from the primate hand.

Authors:  Tracy L Kivell; Matthew M Skinner; Richard Lazenby; Jean-Jacques Hublin
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Optimal sample volumes of human trabecular bone in μCT analysis within vertebral body and femoral head.

Authors:  Xin-Xin Wen; Chun-Lin Zong; Chao Xu; Xiang-Yu Ma; Fa-Qi Wang; Ya-Fei Feng; Ya-Bo Yan; Wei Lei
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-10-15

5.  Accuracy of 3D MR microscopy for trabecular bone assessment: a comparative study on calcaneus samples using 3D synchrotron radiation microtomography.

Authors:  David Last; Françoise Peyrin; Geneviève Guillot
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2004-12-03       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Quantification of trabecular bone structure using magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla--calibration studies using microcomputed tomography as a standard of reference.

Authors:  C A Sell; J N Masi; A Burghardt; D Newitt; T M Link; S Majumdar
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2005-05-05       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Comparative assessment of bone mass and structure using texture-based and histomorphometric analyses.

Authors:  Yongqing Xiang; Vanessa R Yingling; Rumena Malique; Chao Yang Li; Mitchell B Schaffler; Theodore Raphan
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-10-17       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Resolution dependence of the non-metric trabecular structure indices.

Authors:  Miki Sode; Andrew J Burghardt; Robert A Nissenson; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2007-12-23       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  A comparative evaluation of cone beam CT and micro-CT on trabecular bone structures in the human mandible.

Authors:  J Van Dessel; Y Huang; M Depypere; I Rubira-Bullen; F Maes; R Jacobs
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 2.419

10.  Trabecular bone is more deteriorated in spinal cord injured versus estrogen-free postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Jill M Slade; C Scott Bickel; Christopher M Modlesky; Sharmila Majumdar; Gary A Dudley
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-08-28       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.