Literature DB >> 9593906

Responses of single lingual nerve fibers to thermal and chemical stimulation.

D W Pittman1, R J Contreras.   

Abstract

The goals of this study were to characterize the responses of: (1) thermally-sensitive fibers of the lingual branch of the trigeminal nerve to cooling from 35 degrees to 10 degrees C at a rate of 1 degrees C/s; and (2) these neurons to a mid-range concentration of NaCl (150 mM), glucose (150 mM), citric acid (0.3 mM), and quinine-HCl (3 mM) at 35 degrees and 25 degrees C. A cluster analysis of 47 neurons' responses to cooling revealed two major groups and one minor group. Group 1 neurons (n=19) had a shorter latency, exhibited faster time-to-peak activity, and responded over a smaller range of temperature compared to Group 2 neurons (n=22). Group 3 neurons (n=6) exhibited the longest response latency and responded over a wider cooler range of temperature. Twenty-five out of thirty-one thermally-sensitive, non-tactile lingual neurons responded weakly to at least one chemical stimulus, with some neurons responding to 2, 3, or all 4 chemical stimuli. Group 1 neurons responded to more chemical stimuli at 35 degrees C, while Group 2 neurons responded more at 25 degrees C. Under their optimal temperature conditions, Group 1 and Group 2 neurons responded most often to citric acid and least often to glucose, with NaCl and Q-HCl eliciting an intermediate number of responses. As a whole, the responses of thermally-sensitive fibers to chemical stimulation were modest at best with an absence of chemical specificity. There was no evidence of a 'best' stimulus, although there was a suggestion of temporal coding. Copyright 1998 Elsevier Science B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9593906     DOI: 10.1016/s0006-8993(98)00059-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  14 in total

1.  Citric acid and quinine share perceived chemosensory features making oral discrimination difficult in C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  Yada Treesukosol; Clare M Mathes; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  Influences of thermal and gustatory characteristics on sensory and motor aspects of swallowing.

Authors:  Yozo Miyaoka; Keiko Haishima; Masamichi Takagi; Hiroyuki Haishima; Jin Asari; Yoshiaki Yamada
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.438

3.  The candidate sour taste receptor, PKD2L1, is expressed by type III taste cells in the mouse.

Authors:  Shinji Kataoka; Ruibiao Yang; Yoshiro Ishimaru; Hiroaki Matsunami; Jean Sévigny; John C Kinnamon; Thomas E Finger
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 4.  Modulation of taste processing by temperature.

Authors:  Christian H Lemon
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 3.619

5.  Temperature Influences Chorda Tympani Nerve Responses to Sweet, Salty, Sour, Umami, and Bitter Stimuli in Mice.

Authors:  Bo Lu; Joseph M Breza; Robert J Contreras
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 6.  Is fat taste ready for primetime?

Authors:  Nicholas V DiPatrizio
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-03-12

7.  A thermal window for yawning in humans: yawning as a brain cooling mechanism.

Authors:  Jorg J M Massen; Kim Dusch; Omar Tonsi Eldakar; Andrew C Gallup
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-04-12

8.  Mouse Parabrachial Neurons Signal a Relationship between Bitter Taste and Nociceptive Stimuli.

Authors:  Jinrong Li; Christian H Lemon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Residual chemosensory capabilities in double P2X2/P2X3 purinergic receptor null mice: intraoral or postingestive detection?

Authors:  Robert M Hallock; Marco Tatangelo; Jennell Barrows; Thomas E Finger
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 10.  Cracking taste codes by tapping into sensory neuron impulse traffic.

Authors:  Marion E Frank; Robert F Lundy; Robert J Contreras
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2008-09-07       Impact factor: 11.685

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.