Literature DB >> 9593156

Meropenem versus cefuroxime plus gentamicin for treatment of serious infections in elderly patients.

C A Jaspers1, H Kieft, B Speelberg, A Buiting, M van Marwijk Kooij, G J Ruys, H H Vincent, M C Vermeulen, A G Olink, I M Hoepelman.   

Abstract

In this multicenter study, the efficacy of and tolerability for meropenem were compared with those for the combination of cefuroxime-gentamicin (+/- metronidazole) for the treatment of serious bacterial infections in patients > or = 65 years of age. A total of 79 patients were randomized; thirty-nine received meropenem (1 g/8 h), and 40 received cefuroxime (1.5 g/8 h) plus gentamicin (4 mg/kg of body weight daily) for 5 to 10 days. Metronidazole (500 mg/6 h) could be added to the cefuroxime-gentamicin regimen for the treatment of intra-abdominal infections (n = 10). Seventy patients were evaluable for clinical efficacy; the primary diagnoses were as follows: pneumonia in 41 patients (20 treated with meropenem, 21 treated with cefuroxime-gentamicin), intra-abdominal infection in 10 patients (7 meropenem, 3 cefuroxime-gentamicin-metronidazole), urinary tract infection (UTI) in 11 patients (6 meropenem, 5 cefuroxime-gentamicin), sepsis syndrome in 7 patients (4 meropenem, 3 cefuroxime-gentamicin), and "other" in 1 patient (cefuroxime-gentamicin). The pathogens isolated from 18 patients with bacteremia were as follows: Staphylococcus spp. (n = 2), Streptococcus spp. (n = 2), members of the family Enterobacteriaceae (n = 11), and Bacteroides spp. (n = 3). A satisfactory clinical response at the end of therapy was achieved in 26 of 37 (70%) and 24 of 33 (73%) evaluable patients treated with meropenem and combination therapy, respectively. Clinical success was achieved in 23 of 31 (74%) and 21 of 28 (75%) evaluable patients with infections other than UTIs, respectively. A satisfactory microbiological response occurred in 15 of 22 (68%) patients in the meropenem group compared with 12 of 19 (63%) treated with combination therapy. Renal failure occurred during therapy in 2 of 39 (5%) meropenem recipients compared with 5 of 40 (13%) of those treated with combination therapy. The findings in this small study indicate that meropenem is as efficacious for and as well tolerated by elderly patients as the combination of cefuroxime-gentamicin (+/- metronidazole).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9593156      PMCID: PMC105786          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.42.5.1233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  29 in total

1.  General guidelines for the clinical evaluation of anti-infective drug products. Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Food and Drug Administration.

Authors:  T R Beam; D N Gilbert; C M Kunin
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 2.  Imipenem/cilastatin: a pharmacoeconomic appraisal of its use in intra-abdominal infections.

Authors:  P Benfield; P Chrisp
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Aminoglycoside dosage regimens. Is once a day enough?

Authors:  W N Hustinx; I M Hoepelman
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  The pharmacokinetics of meropenem in volunteers.

Authors:  R P Bax; W Bastain; A Featherstone; D M Wilkinson; M Hutchison; S J Haworth
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 5.  Meropenem clinical pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  J W Mouton; J N van den Anker
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Once- versus twice-daily amikacin regimen: efficacy and safety in systemic gram-negative infections. Scandinavian Amikacin Once Daily Study Group.

Authors:  R Maller; H Ahrne; C Holmen; I Lausen; L E Nilsson; J Smedjegård
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 5.790

7.  Once versus thrice daily gentamicin in patients with serious infections.

Authors:  J M Prins; H R Büller; E J Kuijper; R A Tange; P Speelman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-02-06       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Intramuscular meropenem in the treatment of bacterial infections of the urinary and lower respiratory tracts. Italian Intramuscular Meropenem Study Group.

Authors:  G Romanelli; P Cravarezza
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.790

9.  Pharmacokinetics of meropenem compared to imipenem-cilastatin in young, healthy males.

Authors:  I Nilsson-Ehle; M Hutchison; S J Haworth; S R Norrby
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 10.  Laboratory data which differentiate meropenem and imipenem.

Authors:  J R Edwards; P J Turner
Journal:  Scand J Infect Dis Suppl       Date:  1995
View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Meropenem: a review of its use in patients in intensive care.

Authors:  M Hurst; H M Lamb
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Beta lactam antibiotic monotherapy versus beta lactam-aminoglycoside antibiotic combination therapy for sepsis.

Authors:  Mical Paul; Adi Lador; Simona Grozinsky-Glasberg; Leonard Leibovici
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-01-07

Review 3.  Meropenem: an updated review of its use in the management of intra-abdominal infections.

Authors:  M N Lowe; H M Lamb
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Meropenem: a review of its use in the treatment of serious bacterial infections.

Authors:  Claudine M Baldwin; Katherine A Lyseng-Williamson; Susan J Keam
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Beta lactam monotherapy versus beta lactam-aminoglycoside combination therapy for sepsis in immunocompetent patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.

Authors:  Mical Paul; Ishay Benuri-Silbiger; Karla Soares-Weiser; Leonard Leibovici
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-03-02

6.  Safety and efficacy of a novel drug elores (ceftriaxone+sulbactam+disodium edetate) in the management of multi-drug resistant bacterial infections in tertiary care centers: a post-marketing surveillance study.

Authors:  Manu Chaudhary; Mohd Amin Mir; Shiekh Gazalla Ayub
Journal:  Braz J Infect Dis       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 3.257

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.