Literature DB >> 7652504

Laboratory data which differentiate meropenem and imipenem.

J R Edwards1, P J Turner.   

Abstract

Meropenem and imipenem are carbapenems which are distinguishable from all other currently available beta-lactam antibiotics by breadth of antibacterial spectrum and stability to beta-lactamases, but can be differentiated one from another. Meropenem is relatively stable to human renal dehydropeptidase-I (DHP-I); it does not require to be co-administered with cilastatin and consequently, unlike imipenem, will be administered as a single agent. In vitro both meropenem and imipenem are active against almost all clinically important aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. Differences in potency are seen but few may be of clinical significance: imipenem is more active against enterococci and meropenem is more active against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas cepacia, Haemophilus influenzae and Proteus, Morganella and Providencia species. The primary target of imipenem is PBP2 in P. aeruginosa whilst meropenem has high affinity for both PBP2 and 3; this may contribute to greater potency against this organism. Laboratory evaluations predict that meropenem will not be seizurogenic, which combined with activity against likely pathogens, identified its potential for the treatment of bacterial meningitis. This has been investigated in a guinea-pig model in which meropenem exhibited potent activity against the common meningeal pathogens and also infections caused by penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae or Listeria monocytogenes. Clinical experience will determine the significance of these differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7652504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Infect Dis Suppl        ISSN: 0300-8878


  9 in total

1.  Discordant carbapenem susceptibility in Methylobacterium species and its application as a method for phenotypic identification.

Authors:  G J Zaharatos; A Dascal; M A Miller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Meropenem: a review of its use in patients in intensive care.

Authors:  M Hurst; H M Lamb
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Meropenem versus cefuroxime plus gentamicin for treatment of serious infections in elderly patients.

Authors:  C A Jaspers; H Kieft; B Speelberg; A Buiting; M van Marwijk Kooij; G J Ruys; H H Vincent; M C Vermeulen; A G Olink; I M Hoepelman
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Single-dose pharmacokinetics of meropenem during continuous venovenous hemofiltration.

Authors:  F Thalhammer; P Schenk; H Burgmann; I El Menyawi; U M Hollenstein; A R Rosenkranz; G Sunder-Plassmann; S Breyer; K Ratheiser
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Meropenem. A pharmacoeconomic review of its use in serious infections.

Authors:  S M Holliday; P Benfield
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Prospective, randomised, multicentre study of meropenem versus imipenem/cilastatin as empiric monotherapy in severe nosocomial infections.

Authors:  J Garau; J Blanquer; L Cobo; S Corcia; M Daguerre; F J de Latorre; C León; F Del Nogal; A Net; J Rello
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  Empirical monotherapy with meropenem versus imipenem/cilastatin for febrile episodes in neutropenic patients.

Authors:  P M Shah; A Heller; H G Fuhr; F Walther; S Halir; R Schaumann; A Böhme; B Jung; A Köhler; C Lips-Schulte; W Stille
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 8.  Extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae: considerations for diagnosis, prevention and drug treatment.

Authors:  Mark E Rupp; Paul D Fey
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Chemogenomic Screen for Imipenem Resistance in Gram-Negative Bacteria.

Authors:  Jessica Y El Khoury; Alexandra Maure; Hélène Gingras; Philippe Leprohon; Marc Ouellette
Journal:  mSystems       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 6.496

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.