Literature DB >> 10147024

Imipenem/cilastatin: a pharmacoeconomic appraisal of its use in intra-abdominal infections.

P Benfield1, P Chrisp.   

Abstract

Imipenem/cilastatin possesses a very broad spectrum of antibacterial activity that encompasses the range of Gram-negative and Gram-positive aerobes and anaerobes usually associated with intra-abdominal and other polymicrobial infections. Its therapeutic efficacy is comparable to that of aminoglycoside/antianaerobe combination regimens, and the most commonly reported adverse effects are similar to those of other beta-lactam antibacterials and are generally of a non-serious nature. The acquisition cost of imipenem/cilastatin is generally greater than that of aminoglycoside/antianaerobe combination regimens, but treatment with the latter incurs the additional costs of multiple intravenous administration, aminoglycoside pharmacokinetic and other monitoring, and possible nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity. The available pharmacoeconomic studies show a trend towards lower total treatment costs with imipenem/cilastatin compared with gentamicin plus clindamycin. Results from other sources suggest that imipenem/cilastatin may achieve further cost savings through reduced duration of hospitalisation. Although further study is required to confirm these trends, it appears that the total treatment cost of imipenem/cilastatin does not exceed that of usual combination therapy and the risk of aminoglycoside-induced toxicity is avoided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 10147024     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199201060-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  43 in total

Review 1.  Incidence and significance of intraperitoneal aerobic and anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  C E Nord
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.393

2.  The safety profile of imipenem/cilastatin: worldwide clinical experience based on 3470 patients.

Authors:  G B Calandra; C Wang; M Aziz; K R Brown
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  Imipenem versus tobramycin--antianaerobe antibiotic therapy in intra-abdominal infections.

Authors:  D Poenaru; M De Santis; N V Christou
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Improved localization and survival in patients with intraabdominal abscesses.

Authors:  S Saini; J M Kellum; M P O'Leary; T F O'Donnell; F P Tally; B Carter; R A Deterling; L E Curtis
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 5.  Clinical pharmacokinetics, toxicity and cost effectiveness analysis of aminoglycosides and aminoglycoside dosing services.

Authors:  A Mathews; G R Bailie
Journal:  J Clin Pharm Ther       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 2.512

6.  Management of anaerobic infections.

Authors:  S M Finegold; J G Bartlett; A W Chow; D J Flora; S L Gorbach; E J Harder; F P Tally
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Imipenem/cilastatin vs. gentamicin/clindamycin for the treatment of moderate to severe infections in hospitalized patients.

Authors:  J G Guerra; E Casalino; J C Palomino; E Barboza; M del Castillo; M Gonzalez del Riego; V Huapaya; E Antúnez de Mayolo
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1985 Jul-Aug

8.  Imipenem (N-F-thienamycin) versus netilmicin plus clindamycin. A controlled and randomized comparison in intra-abdominal infections.

Authors:  H R Gonzenbach; H P Simmen; R Amgwerd
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Prospective study comparing imipenem-cilastatin with clindamycin and gentamicin for the treatment of serious surgical infections.

Authors:  A W Hackford; F P Tally; R B Reinhold; M Barza; S L Gorbach
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1988-03

10.  Carbapenems, a new class of beta-lactam antibiotics. Discovery and development of imipenem/cilastatin.

Authors:  J Birnbaum; F M Kahan; H Kropp; J S MacDonald
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1985-06-07       Impact factor: 4.965

View more
  7 in total

1.  Consumption of antibiotics in Sweden, 1975 to 1992: pharmacoeconomic and clinical aspects.

Authors:  S R Norrby
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Pharmacoeconomic studies on antibiotics: current controversies.

Authors:  S R Norrby
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Cost analysis of imipenem-cilastatin versus clindamycin with tobramycin in the treatment of acute intra-abdominal infection.

Authors:  G de Lissovoy; A Elixhauser; B R Luce; J Weschler; P Mowery; J Reblando; J Solomkin
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Meropenem versus cefuroxime plus gentamicin for treatment of serious infections in elderly patients.

Authors:  C A Jaspers; H Kieft; B Speelberg; A Buiting; M van Marwijk Kooij; G J Ruys; H H Vincent; M C Vermeulen; A G Olink; I M Hoepelman
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Imipenem/cilastatin: an update of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetics and therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of serious infections.

Authors:  J A Balfour; H M Bryson; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Cost effectiveness of ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole versus imipenem-cilastatin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.

Authors:  D J Walters; J S Solomkin; J A Paladino
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  JBP485, A Dual Inhibitor of Organic Anion Transporters (OATs) and Renal Dehydropeptidase-I (DHP-I), Protects Against Imipenem-Induced Nephrotoxicity.

Authors:  Chong Wang; Changyuan Wang; Jingjing Wu; Qiang Meng; Huan Jin; Huijun Sun; Taiichi Kaku; Jing Chen; Xiaokui Huo; Kexin Liu
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 5.988

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.