Literature DB >> 10776838

Meropenem: a review of its use in patients in intensive care.

M Hurst1, H M Lamb.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Meropenem is a carbapenem antibacterial agent that has antimicrobial activity against gram-negative, gram-positive and anaerobic micro-organisms. In vitro studies involving isolates from patients in intensive care units (ICUs) indicate that meropenem is more active against most gram-negative pathogens than other comparators (including imipenem), although, compared with imipenem, meropenem is less active against most gram-positive organisms. Resistance to meropenem is uncommon in most bacteria. Treatment with meropenem as initial empirical monotherapy was effective in a range of serious infections in adult and paediatric ICU patients. Meropenem monotherapy was as effective as imipenem/cilastatin in 4 comparative trials in terms of satisfactory clinical and bacteriological responses. Meropenem monotherapy was significantly more effective than ceftazidime-based combination treatments in 2 trials in patients with nosocomial lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) in terms of both clinical and bacteriological responses. Meropenem was also more active than ceftazidime-based treatments against both gram-positive and gram-negative organisms. However, 2 studies in patients with a range of serious infections found no significant differences between meropenem and cephalosporin-based treatments in terms of clinical or bacteriological response. Meropenem was also as effective as cephalosporin-based treatments in comparative trials in children with serious infections. Meropenem is well tolerated as either a bolus or an infusion, and clinical trials have shown similar incidences of adverse events to those observed with cephalosporin-based treatments. It is well tolerated by the CNS, with seizures reported infrequently, and can therefore be used at high doses and in patients with meningitis. The incidence of drug-related nausea and vomiting is low and, in contrast to imipenem/cilastatin, does not increase with dose or speed of administration.
CONCLUSIONS: Meropenem is a well tolerated broad spectrum antibacterial agent that, when used as initial empirical monotherapy, is as effective as imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of a range of serious infections (including nosocomial) in adults and children in ICUs. Compared with cephalosporin-based combination treatments, meropenem monotherapy may be more effective in the treatment of nosocomial LRTIs and can be used as monotherapy. Meropenem has an important role in the empirical treatment of serious infections in adults and children in ICUs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10776838     DOI: 10.2165/00003495-200059030-00016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  112 in total

1.  In vitro synergistic activity between meropenem and other beta-lactams against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Y Sumita; S Mitsuhashi
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 2.  Treatment of sepsis: past and future avenues.

Authors:  J D Baumgartner; T Calandra
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  In-vitro selection of porin-deficient mutants of two strains of Klebsiella pneumoniae with reduced susceptibilities to meropenem, but not to imipenem.

Authors:  Z Pragai; E Nagy
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 5.790

4.  The postantibiotic effect of meropenem and imipenem on selected bacteria.

Authors:  H L Nadler; D H Pitkin; W Sheikh
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 5.790

5.  Nosocomial infections in pediatric intensive care units in the United States. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System.

Authors:  M J Richards; J R Edwards; D H Culver; R P Gaynes
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  The pharmacokinetics of meropenem in volunteers.

Authors:  R P Bax; W Bastain; A Featherstone; D M Wilkinson; M Hutchison; S J Haworth
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 5.790

7.  Prospective, randomised, multicentre study of meropenem versus imipenem/cilastatin as empiric monotherapy in severe nosocomial infections.

Authors:  J Garau; J Blanquer; L Cobo; S Corcia; M Daguerre; F J de Latorre; C León; F Del Nogal; A Net; J Rello
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.267

8.  Pharmacodynamic effects of meropenem on gram-negative bacteria.

Authors:  H Hanberger; E Svensson; L E Nilsson; M Nilsson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 9.  Risk reduction in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  S Saint; M A Matthay
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.965

10.  The prevalence of nosocomial infection in intensive care units in Europe. Results of the European Prevalence of Infection in Intensive Care (EPIC) Study. EPIC International Advisory Committee.

Authors:  J L Vincent; D J Bihari; P M Suter; H A Bruining; J White; M H Nicolas-Chanoin; M Wolff; R C Spencer; M Hemmer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995 Aug 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  17 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetic profile of meropenem, administered at 500 milligrams every 8 hours, in plasma and cantharidin-induced skin blister fluid.

Authors:  Dana Maglio; Renli Teng; Per T Thyrum; Charles H Nightingale; David P Nicolau
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Comparison of the pharmacodynamics of meropenem in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia following administration by 3-hour infusion or bolus injection.

Authors:  Sutep Jaruratanasirikul; Somchai Sriwiriyajan; Jarurat Punyo
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Meropenem dosing in critically ill patients with sepsis receiving high-volume continuous venovenous hemofiltration.

Authors:  I Bilgrami; J A Roberts; S C Wallis; J Thomas; J Davis; S Fowler; P B Goldrick; J Lipman
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Short versus long infusion of meropenem in very-low-birth-weight neonates.

Authors:  Helgi Padari; Tuuli Metsvaht; Lenne-Triin Kõrgvee; Eva Germovsek; Mari-Liis Ilmoja; Karin Kipper; Koit Herodes; Joseph F Standing; Kersti Oselin; Irja Lutsar
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Panipenem/betamipron.

Authors:  Karen L Goa; Stuart Noble
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Pharmacokinetics of Continuous Infusion Meropenem With Concurrent Extracorporeal Life Support and Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: A Case Report.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Cies; Wayne S Moore; Susan B Conley; Mindy J Dickerman; Christine Small; Dominick Carella; Paul Shea; Jason Parker; Arun Chopra
Journal:  J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb

Review 7.  Meropenem: a review of its use in the treatment of serious bacterial infections.

Authors:  Claudine M Baldwin; Katherine A Lyseng-Williamson; Susan J Keam
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 8.  Ertapenem: a review of its use in the management of bacterial infections.

Authors:  Monique Curran; Dene Simpson; Caroline Perry
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 9.  Carbapenems versus other beta-lactams in treating severe infections in intensive care: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  S J Edwards; M J Clarke; S Wordsworth; C E Emmas
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2008-03-29       Impact factor: 3.267

10.  Therapeutic efficacy of meropenem for treatment of experimental penicillin-resistant pneumococcal meningitis.

Authors:  Shin-Woo Kim; Joung Hwa Jin; Soo Jung Kang; Sook-In Jung; Yeon-Sook Kim; Choon-Kwan Kim; Hyuck Lee; Won Sup Oh; Sungmin Kim; Kyong Ran Peck; Jae-Hoon Song
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.