Literature DB >> 9592054

Peri-threshold encoding of stimulus frequency and intensity in the M100 latency.

S M Stufflebeam1, D Poeppel, H A Rowley, T P Roberts.   

Abstract

Recent work has suggested that, in addition to spatial tonotopy, pitch and timbre information may be encoded in the temporal activity of the auditory cortex. Specifically, the post-stimulus latency of the maximal cortical evoked neuromagnetic field (M100 or N1m) is a function of stimulus frequency. We investigated the additional effect of varying the stimulus intensity on the M100 response. A 37-channel biomagnetometer recorded neuromagnetic fields over the temporal lobe of healthy volunteers in response to monaurally presented tones. The frequency dependence of the M100 latency remained remarkably invariant even at low stimulus intensity. Thus, for peri-threshold stimuli, frequency information appears encoded in the temporal form of the evoked response.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9592054     DOI: 10.1097/00001756-199801050-00018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  9 in total

1.  Tonotopic cortical representation of periodic complex sounds.

Authors:  Selene Cansino; Antoine Ducorps; Richard Ragot
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Effects of voice harmonic complexity on ERP responses to pitch-shifted auditory feedback.

Authors:  Roozbeh Behroozmand; Oleg Korzyukov; Charles R Larson
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  The analysis of simple and complex auditory signals in human auditory cortex: magnetoencephalographic evidence from M100 modulation.

Authors:  Julian Jenkins; William J Idsardi; David Poeppel
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Low-Frequency Cortical Oscillations Entrain to Subthreshold Rhythmic Auditory Stimuli.

Authors:  Sanne Ten Oever; Charles E Schroeder; David Poeppel; Nienke van Atteveldt; Ashesh D Mehta; Pierre Mégevand; David M Groppe; Elana Zion-Golumbic
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Frequency changes in a continuous tone: auditory cortical potentials.

Authors:  Andrew Dimitrijevic; Henry J Michalewski; Fan-Gang Zeng; Hillel Pratt; Arnold Starr
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  Disentangling the effects of phonation and articulation: hemispheric asymmetries in the auditory N1m response of the human brain.

Authors:  Hannu Tiitinen; Anna Mari Mäkelä; Ville Mäkinen; Patrick J C May; Paavo Alku
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2005-10-15       Impact factor: 3.288

Review 7.  Prospective MEG biomarkers in ASD: pre-clinical evidence and clinical promise of electrophysiological signatures.

Authors:  Russell G Port; Ayesha R Anwar; Matthew Ku; Gregory C Carlson; Steven J Siegel; Timothy P L Roberts
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2015-03-04

8.  The roles of physical and physiological simultaneity in audiovisual multisensory facilitation.

Authors:  Lynnette M Leone; Mark E McCourt
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2013-06-03

9.  Compensating Level-Dependent Frequency Representation in Auditory Cortex by Synaptic Integration of Corticocortical Input.

Authors:  Max F K Happel; Frank W Ohl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.