Literature DB >> 18635394

Frequency changes in a continuous tone: auditory cortical potentials.

Andrew Dimitrijevic1, Henry J Michalewski, Fan-Gang Zeng, Hillel Pratt, Arnold Starr.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We examined auditory cortical potentials in normal hearing subjects to spectral changes in continuous low and high frequency pure tones.
METHODS: Cortical potentials were recorded to increments of frequency from continuous 250 or 4000Hz tones. The magnitude of change was random and varied from 0% to 50% above the base frequency.
RESULTS: Potentials consisted of N100, P200 and a slow negative wave (SN). N100 amplitude, latency and dipole magnitude with frequency increments were significantly greater for low compared to high frequencies. Dipole amplitudes were greater in the right than left hemisphere for both base frequencies. The SN amplitude to frequency changes between 4% and 50% was not significantly related to the magnitude of spectral change.
CONCLUSIONS: Modulation of N100 amplitude and latency elicited by spectral change is more pronounced with low compared to high frequencies. SIGNIFICANCE: These data provide electrophysiological evidence that central processing of spectral changes in the cortex differs for low and high frequencies. Some of these differences may be related to both temporal- and spectral-based coding at the auditory periphery. Central representation of frequency change may be related to the different temporal windows of integration across frequencies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18635394      PMCID: PMC2741402          DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  54 in total

Review 1.  Artifact correction of the ongoing EEG using spatial filters based on artifact and brain signal topographies.

Authors:  Nicole Ille; Patrick Berg; Michael Scherg
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.177

2.  Neuromagnetic evidence for a pitch processing center in Heschl's gyrus.

Authors:  K Krumbholz; R D Patterson; A Seither-Preisler; C Lammertmann; B Lütkenhöner
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  A comparison of neuron response properties in areas A1 and CM of the marmoset monkey auditory cortex: tones and broadband noise.

Authors:  Yoshinao Kajikawa; Lisa de La Mothe; Suzanne Blumell; Troy A Hackett
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Cortical evoked response to acoustic change within a syllable.

Authors:  J M Ostroff; B A Martin; A Boothroyd
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Activation of duration-sensitive auditory cortical fields in humans.

Authors:  C Alain; D L Woods; D Covarrubias
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-11

6.  Tonotopic organization of the sources of human auditory steady-state responses.

Authors:  C Pantev; L E Roberts; T Elbert; B Ross; C Wienbruch
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1996-11-01       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Functional specialization in rhesus monkey auditory cortex.

Authors:  B Tian; D Reser; A Durham; A Kustov; J P Rauschecker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-04-13       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Frequency difference limens for short-duration tones.

Authors:  B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  The scalp topography of potentials in auditory and visual discrimination tasks.

Authors:  R Simson; H G Vaughn; W Ritter
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1977-04

10.  Human auditory sustained potentials. I. The nature of the response.

Authors:  T W Picton; D L Woods; G B Proulx
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1978-08
View more
  19 in total

1.  Stimulus presentation strategies for eliciting the acoustic change complex: increasing efficiency.

Authors:  Brett A Martin; Arthur Boothroyd; Dassan Ali; Tiffany Leach-Berth
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Tinnitus suppression by low-rate electric stimulation and its electrophysiological mechanisms.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Qing Tang; Andrew Dimitrijevic; Arnold Starr; Jannine Larky; Nikolas H Blevins
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Frequency change detection and speech perception in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Fawen Zhang; Gabrielle Underwood; Kelli McGuire; Chun Liang; David R Moore; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Auditory discrimination: the relationship between psychophysical and electrophysiological measures.

Authors:  Shuman He; John H Grose; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.117

5.  Auditory cortical N100 in pre- and post-synaptic auditory neuropathy to frequency or intensity changes of continuous tones.

Authors:  Andrew Dimitrijevic; Arnold Starr; Shrutee Bhatt; Henry J Michalewski; Fan-Gang Zeng; Hillel Pratt
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-09-06       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  The Acoustic Change Complex in Young Children with Hearing Loss: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Amy S Martinez; Laurie S Eisenberg; Arthur Boothroyd
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2013

7.  Relationship Between the Ability to Detect Frequency Changes or Temporal Gaps and Speech Perception Performance in Post-lingual Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Dianzhao Xie; Jianfen Luo; Xiuhua Chao; Jinming Li; Xianqi Liu; Zhaomin Fan; Haibo Wang; Lei Xu
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 5.152

8.  Tone-Evoked Acoustic Change Complex (ACC) Recorded in a Sedated Animal Model.

Authors:  Alessandro Presacco; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-10

9.  Cortical imbalance following delayed restoration of bilateral hearing in deaf adolescents.

Authors:  Carly A Anderson; Sharon L Cushing; Blake C Papsin; Karen A Gordon
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 5.399

10.  Acoustic change responses to amplitude modulation: a method to quantify cortical temporal processing and hemispheric asymmetry.

Authors:  Ji Hye Han; Andrew Dimitrijevic
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.