Literature DB >> 28411273

Low-Frequency Cortical Oscillations Entrain to Subthreshold Rhythmic Auditory Stimuli.

Sanne Ten Oever1, Charles E Schroeder2,3, David Poeppel4,5, Nienke van Atteveldt1,6, Ashesh D Mehta7, Pierre Mégevand7, David M Groppe7, Elana Zion-Golumbic8,3,9.   

Abstract

Many environmental stimuli contain temporal regularities, a feature that can help predict forthcoming input. Phase locking (entrainment) of ongoing low-frequency neuronal oscillations to rhythmic stimuli is proposed as a potential mechanism for enhancing neuronal responses and perceptual sensitivity, by aligning high-excitability phases to events within a stimulus stream. Previous experiments show that rhythmic structure has a behavioral benefit even when the rhythm itself is below perceptual detection thresholds (ten Oever et al., 2014). It is not known whether this "inaudible" rhythmic sound stream also induces entrainment. Here we tested this hypothesis using magnetoencephalography and electrocorticography in humans to record changes in neuronal activity as subthreshold rhythmic stimuli gradually became audible. We found that significant phase locking to the rhythmic sounds preceded participants' detection of them. Moreover, no significant auditory-evoked responses accompanied this prethreshold entrainment. These auditory-evoked responses, distinguished by robust, broad-band increases in intertrial coherence, only appeared after sounds were reported as audible. Taken together with the reduced perceptual thresholds observed for rhythmic sequences, these findings support the proposition that entrainment of low-frequency oscillations serves a mechanistic role in enhancing perceptual sensitivity for temporally predictive sounds. This framework has broad implications for understanding the neural mechanisms involved in generating temporal predictions and their relevance for perception, attention, and awareness.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The environment is full of rhythmically structured signals that the nervous system can exploit for information processing. Thus, it is important to understand how the brain processes such temporally structured, regular features of external stimuli. Here we report the alignment of slowly fluctuating oscillatory brain activity to external rhythmic structure before its behavioral detection. These results indicate that phase alignment is a general mechanism of the brain to process rhythmic structure and can occur without the perceptual detection of this temporal structure.
Copyright © 2017 the authors 0270-6474/17/374903-10$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ECoG; MEG; auditory; detection; entrainment; oscillations

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28411273      PMCID: PMC5426181          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3658-16.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  47 in total

Review 1.  A mechanism for cognitive dynamics: neuronal communication through neuronal coherence.

Authors:  Pascal Fries
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Tuning of the human neocortex to the temporal dynamics of attended events.

Authors:  Julien Besle; Catherine A Schevon; Ashesh D Mehta; Peter Lakatos; Robert R Goodman; Guy M McKhann; Ronald G Emerson; Charles E Schroeder
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  iELVis: An open source MATLAB toolbox for localizing and visualizing human intracranial electrode data.

Authors:  David M Groppe; Stephan Bickel; Andrew R Dykstra; Xiuyuan Wang; Pierre Mégevand; Manuel R Mercier; Fred A Lado; Ashesh D Mehta; Christopher J Honey
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 2.390

4.  Rhythmicity and cross-modal temporal cues facilitate detection.

Authors:  Sanne ten Oever; Charles E Schroeder; David Poeppel; Nienke van Atteveldt; Elana Zion-Golumbic
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Delta-Beta Coupled Oscillations Underlie Temporal Prediction Accuracy.

Authors:  Luc H Arnal; Keith B Doelling; David Poeppel
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution.

Authors:  A J Bell; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.026

Review 7.  Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis.

Authors:  W Singer; C M Gray
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

8.  Auditory magnetic fields from the human cortex. Influence of stimulus intensity.

Authors:  C Elberling; C Bak; B Kofoed; J Lebech; K Saermark
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1981

9.  Neural response phase tracks how listeners learn new acoustic representations.

Authors:  Huan Luo; Xing Tian; Kun Song; Ke Zhou; David Poeppel
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  FieldTrip: Open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data.

Authors:  Robert Oostenveld; Pascal Fries; Eric Maris; Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-23
View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  A New Unifying Account of the Roles of Neuronal Entrainment.

Authors:  Peter Lakatos; Joachim Gross; Gregor Thut
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Audiovisual Modulation in Mouse Primary Visual Cortex Depends on Cross-Modal Stimulus Configuration and Congruency.

Authors:  Guido T Meijer; Jorrit S Montijn; Cyriel M A Pennartz; Carien S Lansink
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Anticipated moments: temporal structure in attention.

Authors:  Anna C Nobre; Freek van Ede
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 4.  Neural entrainment and network resonance in support of top-down guided attention.

Authors:  Randolph F Helfrich; Assaf Breska; Robert T Knight
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2019-01-02

5.  Spatial Attention and Temporal Expectation Exert Differential Effects on Visual and Auditory Discrimination.

Authors:  Anna Wilsch; Manuel R Mercier; Jonas Obleser; Charles E Schroeder; Saskia Haegens
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Reliability of Neural Entrainment in the Human Auditory System.

Authors:  Yuranny Cabral-Calderin; Molly J Henry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 6.709

7.  Visual cortex responds to sound onset and offset during passive listening.

Authors:  David Brang; John Plass; Aleksandra Sherman; William C Stacey; Vibhangini S Wasade; Marcia Grabowecky; EunSeon Ahn; Vernon L Towle; James X Tao; Shasha Wu; Naoum P Issa; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 2.974

8.  Neural Signatures of the Processing of Temporal Patterns in Sound.

Authors:  Björn Herrmann; Ingrid S Johnsrude
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Neural integration underlying naturalistic prediction flexibly adapts to varying sensory input rate.

Authors:  Thomas J Baumgarten; Brian Maniscalco; Jennifer L Lee; Matthew W Flounders; Patrice Abry; Biyu J He
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  High-Frequency Visual Stimulation Primes Gamma Oscillations for Visually Evoked Phase Reset and Enhances Spatial Acuity.

Authors:  Crystal L Lantz; Elizabeth M Quinlan
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2021-03-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.