Literature DB >> 9585599

Missense mutations in disease genes: a Bayesian approach to evaluate causality.

G M Petersen1, G Parmigiani, D Thomas.   

Abstract

The problem of interpreting missense mutations of disease-causing genes is an increasingly important one. Because these point mutations result in alteration of only a single amino acid of the protein product, it is often unclear whether this change alone is sufficient to cause disease. We propose a Bayesian approach that utilizes genetic information on affected relatives in families ascertained through known missense-mutation carriers. This method is useful in evaluating known disease genes for common disease phenotypes, such as breast cancer or colorectal cancer. The posterior probability that a missense mutation is disease causing is conditioned on the relationship of the relatives to the proband, the population frequency of the mutation, and the phenocopy rate of the disease. The approach is demonstrated in two cancer data sets: BRCA1 R841W and APC I1307K. In both examples, this method helps establish that these mutations are likely to be disease causing, with Bayes factors in favor of causality of 5.09 and 66.97, respectively, and posterior probabilities of .836 and .985. We also develop a simple approximation for rare alleles and consider the case of unknown penetrance and allele frequency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9585599      PMCID: PMC1377150          DOI: 10.1086/301871

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  14 in total

1.  Effective testing of gene-disease associations.

Authors:  M Swift; L L Kupper; C L Chase
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 2.  A gene map of the human genome.

Authors:  G D Schuler; M S Boguski; E A Stewart; L D Stein; G Gyapay; K Rice; R E White; P Rodriguez-Tomé; A Aggarwal; E Bajorek; S Bentolila; B B Birren; A Butler; A B Castle; N Chiannilkulchai; A Chu; C Clee; S Cowles; P J Day; T Dibling; N Drouot; I Dunham; S Duprat; C East; C Edwards; J B Fan; N Fang; C Fizames; C Garrett; L Green; D Hadley; M Harris; P Harrison; S Brady; A Hicks; E Holloway; L Hui; S Hussain; C Louis-Dit-Sully; J Ma; A MacGilvery; C Mader; A Maratukulam; T C Matise; K B McKusick; J Morissette; A Mungall; D Muselet; H C Nusbaum; D C Page; A Peck; S Perkins; M Piercy; F Qin; J Quackenbush; S Ranby; T Reif; S Rozen; C Sanders; X She; J Silva; D K Slonim; C Soderlund; W L Sun; P Tabar; T Thangarajah; N Vega-Czarny; D Vollrath; S Voyticky; T Wilmer; X Wu; M D Adams; C Auffray; N A Walter; R Brandon; A Dehejia; P N Goodfellow; R Houlgatte; J R Hudson; S E Ide; K R Iorio; W Y Lee; N Seki; T Nagase; K Ishikawa; N Nomura; C Phillips; M H Polymeropoulos; M Sandusky; K Schmitt; R Berry; K Swanson; R Torres; J C Venter; J M Sikela; J S Beckmann; J Weissenbach; R M Myers; D R Cox; M R James; D Bentley; P Deloukas; E S Lander; T J Hudson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-10-25       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Predictive genetic testing: from basic research to clinical practice.

Authors:  N A Holtzman; P D Murphy; M S Watson; P A Barr
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-10-24       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Genetic testing for susceptibility to adult-onset cancer. The process and content of informed consent.

Authors:  G Geller; J R Botkin; M J Green; N Press; B B Biesecker; B Wilfond; G Grana; M B Daly; K Schneider; M J Kahn
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Pitfalls of genetic testing.

Authors:  R Hubbard; R C Lewontin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-05-02       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Methods for epidemiologic analyses of multiple exposures: a review and comparative study of maximum-likelihood, preliminary-testing, and empirical-Bayes regression.

Authors:  S Greenland
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1993-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 7.  Molecular genetic approaches to understanding disease.

Authors:  J Savill
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-01-11

8.  Molecular genotyping shows that ataxia-telangiectasia heterozygotes are predisposed to breast cancer.

Authors:  P Athma; R Rappaport; M Swift
Journal:  Cancer Genet Cytogenet       Date:  1996-12

9.  How is the Human Genome Project doing, and what have we learned so far?

Authors:  M S Guyer; F S Collins
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-11-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  The genetics of breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  D Ford; D F Easton
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  15 in total

1.  A full-likelihood method for the evaluation of causality of sequence variants from family data.

Authors:  Deborah Thompson; Douglas F Easton; David E Goldgar
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-07-29       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Integrated evaluation of DNA sequence variants of unknown clinical significance: application to BRCA1 and BRCA2.

Authors:  David E Goldgar; Douglas F Easton; Amie M Deffenbaugh; Alvaro N A Monteiro; Sean V Tavtigian; Fergus J Couch
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-08-02       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Classification of Missense Mutations of Disease Genes.

Authors:  Xi Zhou; Edwin S Iversen; Giovanni Parmigiani
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.033

4.  Detection of activating mutations in liquid biopsy of Egyptian breast cancer patients using targeted next-generation sequencing: a pilot study.

Authors:  Neemat Kassem; Hebatallah Kassem; Loay Kassem; Mohamed Hassan
Journal:  J Egypt Natl Canc Inst       Date:  2021-04-17

5.  Genetic evidence and integration of various data sources for classifying uncertain variants into a single model.

Authors:  David E Goldgar; Douglas F Easton; Graham B Byrnes; Amanda B Spurdle; Edwin S Iversen; Marc S Greenblatt
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.878

6.  Understanding missense mutations in the BRCA1 gene: an evolutionary approach.

Authors:  Melissa A Fleming; John D Potter; Christina J Ramirez; Gary K Ostrander; Elaine A Ostrander
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-01-16       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Inherited colorectal polyposis and cancer risk of the APC I1307K polymorphism.

Authors:  R Gryfe; N Di Nicola; G Lal; S Gallinger; M Redston
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  A simple method for co-segregation analysis to evaluate the pathogenicity of unclassified variants; BRCA1 and BRCA2 as an example.

Authors:  Leila Mohammadi; Maaike P Vreeswijk; Rogier Oldenburg; Ans van den Ouweland; Jan C Oosterwijk; Annemarie H van der Hout; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge; Marjolijn Ligtenberg; Margreet G Ausems; Rob B van der Luijt; Charlotte J Dommering; Johan J Gille; Senno Verhoef; Frans B Hogervorst; Theo A van Os; Encarna Gómez García; Marinus J Blok; Juul T Wijnen; Quinta Helmer; Peter Devilee; Christi J van Asperen; Hans C van Houwelingen
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-06-29       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  A systematic genetic assessment of 1,433 sequence variants of unknown clinical significance in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 breast cancer-predisposition genes.

Authors:  Douglas F Easton; Amie M Deffenbaugh; Dmitry Pruss; Cynthia Frye; Richard J Wenstrup; Kristina Allen-Brady; Sean V Tavtigian; Alvaro N A Monteiro; Edwin S Iversen; Fergus J Couch; David E Goldgar
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-09-06       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Large numbers of individuals are required to classify and define risk for rare variants in known cancer risk genes.

Authors:  Brian H Shirts; Angela Jacobson; Gail P Jarvik; Brian L Browning
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.