Literature DB >> 17924331

A systematic genetic assessment of 1,433 sequence variants of unknown clinical significance in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 breast cancer-predisposition genes.

Douglas F Easton1, Amie M Deffenbaugh, Dmitry Pruss, Cynthia Frye, Richard J Wenstrup, Kristina Allen-Brady, Sean V Tavtigian, Alvaro N A Monteiro, Edwin S Iversen, Fergus J Couch, David E Goldgar.   

Abstract

Mutation screening of the breast and ovarian cancer-predisposition genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 is becoming an increasingly important part of clinical practice. Classification of rare nontruncating sequence variants in these genes is problematic, because it is not known whether these subtle changes alter function sufficiently to predispose cells to cancer development. Using data from the Myriad Genetic Laboratories database of nearly 70,000 full-sequence tests, we assessed the clinical significance of 1,433 sequence variants of unknown significance (VUSs) in the BRCA genes. Three independent measures were employed in the assessment: co-occurrence in trans of a VUS with known deleterious mutations; detailed analysis, by logistic regression, of personal and family history of cancer in VUS-carrying probands; and, in a subset of probands, an analysis of cosegregation with disease in pedigrees. For each of these factors, a likelihood ratio was computed under the hypothesis that the VUSs were equivalent to an "average" deleterious mutation, compared with neutral, with respect to risk. The likelihood ratios derived from each component were combined to provide an overall assessment for each VUS. A total of 133 VUSs had odds of at least 100 : 1 in favor of neutrality with respect to risk, whereas 43 had odds of at least 20 : 1 in favor of being deleterious. VUSs with evidence in favor of causality were those that were predicted to affect splicing, fell at positions that are highly conserved among BRCA orthologs, and were more likely to be located in specific domains of the proteins. In addition to their utility for improved genetics counseling of patients and their families, the global assessment reported here will be invaluable for validation of functional assays, structural models, and in silico analyses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17924331      PMCID: PMC2265654          DOI: 10.1086/521032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  37 in total

1.  A full-likelihood method for the evaluation of causality of sequence variants from family data.

Authors:  Deborah Thompson; Douglas F Easton; David E Goldgar
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-07-29       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Analysis of missense variation in human BRCA1 in the context of interspecific sequence variation.

Authors:  V Abkevich; A Zharkikh; A M Deffenbaugh; D Frank; Y Chen; D Shattuck; M H Skolnick; A Gutin; S V Tavtigian
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.318

3.  Application of embryonic lethal or other obvious phenotypes to characterize the clinical significance of genetic variants found in trans with known deleterious mutations.

Authors:  Thaddeus Judkins; Brant C Hendrickson; Amie M Deffenbaugh; Kristilyn Eliason; Benoît Leclair; Michael J Norton; Brian E Ward; Dmitri Pruss; Thomas Scholl
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2005-11-01       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Genetic and histopathologic evaluation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 DNA sequence variants of unknown clinical significance.

Authors:  Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Sue Healey; Sunil Lakhani; Paul Waring; Margaret Cummings; Ross Brinkworth; Amie M Deffenbaugh; Lynn Anne Burbidge; Dmitry Pruss; Thad Judkins; Tom Scholl; Anna Bekessy; Anna Marsh; Paul Lovelock; Ming Wong; Andrea Tesoriero; Helene Renard; Melissa Southey; John L Hopper; Koulis Yannoukakos; Melissa Brown; Douglas Easton; Sean V Tavtigian; David Goldgar; Amanda B Spurdle
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Comprehensive statistical study of 452 BRCA1 missense substitutions with classification of eight recurrent substitutions as neutral.

Authors:  S V Tavtigian; A M Deffenbaugh; L Yin; T Judkins; T Scholl; P B Samollow; D de Silva; A Zharkikh; A Thomas
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2005-07-13       Impact factor: 6.318

6.  Genetic, functional, and histopathological evaluation of two C-terminal BRCA1 missense variants.

Authors:  P K Lovelock; S Healey; W Au; E Y M Sum; A Tesoriero; E M Wong; S Hinson; R Brinkworth; A Bekessy; O Diez; L Izatt; E Solomon; M Jenkins; H Renard; J Hopper; P Waring; S V Tavtigian; D Goldgar; G J Lindeman; J E Visvader; F J Couch; B R Henderson; M Southey; G Chenevix-Trench; A B Spurdle; M A Brown
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2005-05-27       Impact factor: 6.318

7.  Classification of BRCA1 missense variants of unknown clinical significance.

Authors:  C M Phelan; V Dapic; B Tice; R Favis; E Kwan; F Barany; S Manoukian; P Radice; R B van der Luijt; B P M van Nesselrooij; G Chenevix-Trench; T Caldes; M de la Hoya; S Lindquist; S V Tavtigian; D Goldgar; A Borg; S A Narod; A N A Monteiro
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 6.318

8.  BRCA2 function in DNA binding and recombination from a BRCA2-DSS1-ssDNA structure.

Authors:  Haijuan Yang; Philip D Jeffrey; Julie Miller; Elspeth Kinnucan; Yutong Sun; Nicolas H Thoma; Ning Zheng; Phang-Lang Chen; Wen-Hwa Lee; Nikola P Pavletich
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-09-13       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Cancer risk assessment at the atomic level.

Authors:  Alvaro N A Monteiro; Fergus J Couch
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Strategies for multilocus linkage analysis in humans.

Authors:  G M Lathrop; J M Lalouel; C Julier; J Ott
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  202 in total

1.  Mutations in BRCA2 and PALB2 in male breast cancer cases from the United States.

Authors:  Yuan Chun Ding; Linda Steele; Chih-Jen Kuan; Scott Greilac; Susan L Neuhausen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Detecting rare variants.

Authors:  Tao Feng; Xiaofeng Zhu
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2012

Review 3.  Functional analysis of human BRCA2 variants using a mouse embryonic stem cell-based assay.

Authors:  Sergey G Kuznetsov; Suhwan Chang; Shyam K Sharan
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2010

4.  Consensus: a framework for evaluation of uncertain gene variants in laboratory test reporting.

Authors:  David K Crockett; Perry G Ridge; Andrew R Wilson; Elaine Lyon; Marc S Williams; Scott P Narus; Julio C Facelli; Joyce A Mitchell
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 11.117

Review 5.  Functional assays for analysis of variants of uncertain significance in BRCA2.

Authors:  Lucia Guidugli; Aura Carreira; Sandrine M Caputo; Asa Ehlen; Alvaro Galli; Alvaro N A Monteiro; Susan L Neuhausen; Thomas V O Hansen; Fergus J Couch; Maaike P G Vreeswijk
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 4.878

6.  Variants of uncertain significance in BRCA testing: evaluation of surgical decisions, risk perception, and cancer distress.

Authors:  J O Culver; C D Brinkerhoff; J Clague; K Yang; K E Singh; S R Sand; J N Weitzel
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 4.438

Review 7.  Tus-Ter as a tool to study site-specific DNA replication perturbation in eukaryotes.

Authors:  Nicolai B Larsen; Ian D Hickson; Hocine W Mankouri
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.534

8.  In silico analysis of missense substitutions using sequence-alignment based methods.

Authors:  Sean V Tavtigian; Marc S Greenblatt; Fabienne Lesueur; Graham B Byrnes
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.878

9.  Assessing pathogenicity: overview of results from the IARC Unclassified Genetic Variants Working Group.

Authors:  Sean V Tavtigian; Marc S Greenblatt; David E Goldgar; Paolo Boffetta
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.878

10.  Prediction and assessment of splicing alterations: implications for clinical testing.

Authors:  Amanda B Spurdle; Fergus J Couch; Frans B L Hogervorst; Paolo Radice; Olga M Sinilnikova
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.878

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.