Literature DB >> 9584432

Resource allocation during the rereading of scientific texts.

K K Millis1, S Simon, N S tenBroek.   

Abstract

Two experiments examined how cognitive resources are allocated to comprehension processes across two readings of the same scientific texts. In Experiment 1, readers read and later reread texts describing scientific topics. The results indicated that across readings, readers decreased resources allocated to proposition assembly, increased resources allocated to text-level integration, and expended a similar amount of resources to lexical access. Subjects who reread the texts after a week delay showed a similar pattern, except that they did not show the increase for text-level integration. Experiment 2 revealed a similar pattern of results with a moving window procedure, except that there was a significant decrease in resources allocated to lexical access across exposures. This experiment also indicated that the rereading speedup was greatest at sentence boundaries, suggesting that the prior exposure enabled readers to immediately process each word. Overall, the results are consistent with the claim that readers allocate proportionally more available resources to text-level integration during rereading because proposition assembly, which enables text-level integration, can be completed with fewer resources.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9584432     DOI: 10.3758/bf03201136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  16 in total

1.  Working memory constraints on the processing of syntactic ambiguity.

Authors:  M C MacDonald; M A Just; P A Carpenter
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory.

Authors:  M A Just; P A Carpenter
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  The level-of-focal-attention hypothesis in oral reading: influence of strategies on the context specificity of lexical repetition effects.

Authors:  L A Carlson; A R Alejano; T H Carr
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  A new readability yardstick.

Authors:  R FLESCH
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  1948-06

5.  What is recalled after hearing a passage?

Authors:  B J Meyer; G W McConkie
Journal:  J Educ Psychol       Date:  1973-08

6.  Textual constraint as function of repeated inspection.

Authors:  E Z Rothkope
Journal:  J Educ Psychol       Date:  1968-02

7.  Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension.

Authors:  M A Just; P A Carpenter; J D Woolley
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1982-06

8.  The role of semantic information in reading spatially transformed text.

Authors:  K D Horton
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  A discourse on semantic priming.

Authors:  D J Foss
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.

Authors:  M S Seidenberg; J L McClelland
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  15 in total

1.  The rereading effect: metacomprehension accuracy improves across reading trials.

Authors:  K A Rawson; J Dunlosky; K W Thiede
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-09

2.  Effects of headings and familiarity with a text on strategies for searching a text.

Authors:  M A Klusewitz; R F Lorch
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-06

3.  How does background information improve memory for text content?

Authors:  Katherine A Rawson; Walter Kintsch
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-07

4.  Age differences in rereading.

Authors:  Elizabeth A L Stine-Morrow; Danielle D Gagne; Daniel G Morrow; Barbara Herman DeWall
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-07

5.  Text cohesion and metacomprehension: immediate and delayed judgments.

Authors:  N Lefèvre; G Lories
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-12

Review 6.  Aging and self-regulated language processing.

Authors:  Elizabeth A L Stine-Morrow; Lisa M Soederberg Miller; Christopher Hertzog
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Perspective effects in repeated reading: an eye movement study.

Authors:  Johanna K Kaakinen; Jukka Hyönä
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-09

8.  Individual differences, rereading, and self-explanation: concurrent processing and cue validity as constraints on metacomprehension accuracy.

Authors:  Thomas D Griffin; Jennifer Wiley; Keith W Thiede
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-01

9.  Individual differences in syntactic ambiguity resolution: readers vary in their use of plausibility information.

Authors:  Debra L Long; Chantel S Prat
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-03

10.  Diagrams increase the recall of nondepicted text when understanding is also increased.

Authors:  Michael J Serra
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.