Literature DB >> 9570581

Reprogramming phonologically similar utterances: the role of phonetic features in pre-motor encoding.

M A Rogers1, H L Storkel.   

Abstract

The effects of phonologic similarity on speech production latencies were investigated to explore the role of articulatory phonetic features and reprogramming operations during pre-motor stages of production. A form-based priming technique was used in five experiments to elicit rapid productions of single words. Subjects responded to visually presented pairs of minimally contrastive monosyllabic words, which varied with respect to the phonetic featural similarity of their onsets. Factors that were systematically manipulated across experiments included stimulus set size, duration of the interstimulus interval, and the use of feedback to subjects concerning their response latencies. Speech onset latencies obtained in a control condition in which no phonetic features were shared were compared to four other conditions in which the word initial phonemes of prime-target pairs did share features. Results revealed that shared manner was the most influential factor associated with the observed inhibitory phonologic similarity effect. In addition, smaller stimulus set size (6 words) yielded significantly slower overall response latencies than experiments employing larger stimulus sets (18 words). These findings suggested that inhibitory phonologic similarity effects did not stem from biomechanical constraints imposed by the articulatory system. Rather the methods employed in this investigation were supported as a means to investigate both the underlying units of representation and the processes involved in pre-motor planning apart from articulatory effects. The results of this investigation also supported the hypothesis that, during phonologic encoding, word form retrieval entails the selection and assembly of sublexical units into word form frames. No evidence of whole word retrieval during pre-motor encoding was obtained. The potential utility of this experimental paradigm in the investigation of pre-motor planning in disorders that putatively affect the processes involved in transforming word meaning into word form is also discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9570581     DOI: 10.1044/jslhr.4102.258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  8 in total

1.  The effect of feedback schedule manipulation on speech priming patterns and reaction time.

Authors:  Dana Slocomb; Kristie A Spencer
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2008-09-12

2.  Vowel and Sibilant Production in Noise: Effects of Noise Frequency and Phonological Similarity.

Authors:  Kevin J Reilly
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 3.  Tutorial: Speech Motor Chaining Treatment for School-Age Children With Speech Sound Disorders.

Authors:  Jonathan L Preston; Megan C Leece; Jaclyn Storto
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  The effect of speaking rate on serial-order sound-level errors in normal healthy controls and persons with aphasia.

Authors:  Tepanta R D Fossett; Malcolm R McNeil; Sheila R Pratt; Connie A Tompkins; Linda I Shuster
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 2.773

5.  Neural representations and mechanisms for the performance of simple speech sequences.

Authors:  Jason W Bohland; Daniel Bullock; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  To Lump or to Split? Possible Subtypes of Apraxia of Speech.

Authors:  Marja-Liisa Mailend; Edwin Maas
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 2.773

7.  Examining speech motor planning difficulties in apraxia of speech and aphasia via the sequential production of phonetically similar words.

Authors:  Marja-Liisa Mailend; Edwin Maas; Pélagie M Beeson; Brad H Story; Kenneth I Forster
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2020-11-29       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Sequence complexity effects on speech production in healthy speakers and speakers with hypokinetic or ataxic dysarthria.

Authors:  Kevin J Reilly; Kristie A Spencer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.