Literature DB >> 33249997

Examining speech motor planning difficulties in apraxia of speech and aphasia via the sequential production of phonetically similar words.

Marja-Liisa Mailend1,2, Edwin Maas1,3, Pélagie M Beeson1, Brad H Story1, Kenneth I Forster4.   

Abstract

This study investigated the underlying nature of apraxia of speech (AOS) by testing two competing hypotheses. The Reduced Buffer Capacity Hypothesis argues that people with AOS can plan speech only one syllable at a time Rogers and Storkel [1999. Planning speech one syllable at a time: The reduced buffer capacity hypothesis in apraxia of speech. Aphasiology, 13(9-11), 793-805. https://doi.org/10.1080/026870399401885]. The Program Retrieval Deficit Hypothesis states that selecting a motor programme is difficult in face of competition from other simultaneously activated programmes Mailend and Maas [2013. Speech motor programming in apraxia of speech: Evidence from a delayed picture-word interference task. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 22(2), S380-S396. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2013/12-0101)]. Speakers with AOS and aphasia, aphasia without AOS, and unimpaired controls were asked to prepare and hold a two-word utterance until a go-signal prompted a spoken response. Phonetic similarity between target words was manipulated. Speakers with AOS had longer reaction times in conditions with two similar words compared to two identical words. The Control and the Aphasia group did not show this effect. These results suggest that speakers with AOS need additional processing time to retrieve target words when multiple motor programmes are simultaneously activated.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apraxia of speech; aphasia; language production; reaction time; speech motor planning

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33249997      PMCID: PMC7895325          DOI: 10.1080/02643294.2020.1847059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol        ISSN: 0264-3294            Impact factor:   2.468


  33 in total

1.  N-watch: a program for deriving neighborhood size and other psycholinguistic statistics.

Authors:  Colin J Davis
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2005-02

2.  Speech motor planning in the context of phonetically similar words: Evidence from apraxia of speech and aphasia.

Authors:  Marja-Liisa Mailend; Edwin Maas; Pélagie M Beeson; Brad H Story; Kenneth I Forster
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 3.  Apraxia of speech: concepts and controversies.

Authors:  Wolfram Ziegler; Ingrid Aichert; Anja Staiger
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Comparing phoneme frequency, age of acquisition, and loss in aphasia: Implications for phonological universals.

Authors:  Cristina Romani; Claudia Galuzzi; Cecilia Guariglia; Jeremy Goslin
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production.

Authors:  G S Dell
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  The sequential curing effect in speech production.

Authors:  C A Sevald; G S Dell
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1994-11

7.  A Psycholinguistic Framework for Diagnosis and Treatment Planning of Developmental Speech Disorders.

Authors:  Hayo Terband; Ben Maassen; Edwin Maas
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 0.849

8.  The Apraxia of Speech Rating Scale: a tool for diagnosis and description of apraxia of speech.

Authors:  Edythe A Strand; Joseph R Duffy; Heather M Clark; Keith Josephs
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 2.288

9.  Neural representations and mechanisms for the performance of simple speech sequences.

Authors:  Jason W Bohland; Daniel Bullock; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  A predictive model for diagnosing stroke-related apraxia of speech.

Authors:  Kirrie J Ballard; Lamiae Azizi; Joseph R Duffy; Malcolm R McNeil; Mark Halaki; Nicholas O'Dwyer; Claire Layfield; Dominique I Scholl; Adam P Vogel; Donald A Robin
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  1 in total

1.  To Lump or to Split? Possible Subtypes of Apraxia of Speech.

Authors:  Marja-Liisa Mailend; Edwin Maas
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 2.773

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.