BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is a troublesome health problem, particularly among underserved and minority women. Early detection through screening mammography can reduce the impact of this disease, yet it remains underused. Objective. We examined cost as a barrier to screening mammography and studied the accuracy of women's perceptions of the cost of a mammogram among a rural, low-income, tri-racial (white, Native American and African American) population in need of a mammogram. DESIGN: We interviewed 897 women age 40 and older, asking about cost as a barrier to mammography and perceptions about the actual costs of a screening mammogram. Face-to-face interviews were conducted between 1998 and 2000 among women participating in a randomized, controlled study to evaluate a health education intervention to improve mammography screening rates in an underserved population. All data used in these analyses were from the baseline interviews. RESULTS: Cost acted as a barrier to screening mammography for a majority of the participants (53%). More than half of these women (52%), however, overestimated the cost of a screening mammogram, and overestimation of the cost was significantly related to mentioning cost as a barrier (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.04-2.33). Higher estimates of out-of-pocket costs were associated with reporting cost as a barrier to mammography (OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.43-3.52 for $1-50 and OR 12.64, 95% CI 6.61-24.17 for >$50). Factors such as race, income and employment status were not related to reporting cost as a barrier to screening mammography. CONCLUSIONS: Among a group of tri-racial, low-income, rural women who were in need of a mammogram, cost was a common barrier. Overestimating the cost, however, was significantly and positively associated with reporting cost as a barrier. Providing information about the actual cost women have to pay for mammograms may lessen the role of cost as a barrier to mammography screening, especially for underserved women, potentially improving utilization rates.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Breast cancer is a troublesome health problem, particularly among underserved and minority women. Early detection through screening mammography can reduce the impact of this disease, yet it remains underused. Objective. We examined cost as a barrier to screening mammography and studied the accuracy of women's perceptions of the cost of a mammogram among a rural, low-income, tri-racial (white, Native American and African American) population in need of a mammogram. DESIGN: We interviewed 897 women age 40 and older, asking about cost as a barrier to mammography and perceptions about the actual costs of a screening mammogram. Face-to-face interviews were conducted between 1998 and 2000 among women participating in a randomized, controlled study to evaluate a health education intervention to improve mammography screening rates in an underserved population. All data used in these analyses were from the baseline interviews. RESULTS: Cost acted as a barrier to screening mammography for a majority of the participants (53%). More than half of these women (52%), however, overestimated the cost of a screening mammogram, and overestimation of the cost was significantly related to mentioning cost as a barrier (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.04-2.33). Higher estimates of out-of-pocket costs were associated with reporting cost as a barrier to mammography (OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.43-3.52 for $1-50 and OR 12.64, 95% CI 6.61-24.17 for >$50). Factors such as race, income and employment status were not related to reporting cost as a barrier to screening mammography. CONCLUSIONS: Among a group of tri-racial, low-income, rural women who were in need of a mammogram, cost was a common barrier. Overestimating the cost, however, was significantly and positively associated with reporting cost as a barrier. Providing information about the actual cost women have to pay for mammograms may lessen the role of cost as a barrier to mammography screening, especially for underserved women, potentially improving utilization rates.
Authors: Carol Friedman; Faruque Ahmed; Adele Franks; Tom Weatherup; Marsha Manning; April Vance; Betsy L Thompson Journal: Med Care Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: George Rust; Shun Zhang; Khusdeep Malhotra; Leroy Reese; Luceta McRoy; Peter Baltrus; Lee Caplan; Robert S Levine Journal: Cancer Date: 2015-04-23 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Ann Scheck McAlearney; Paula H Song; Dale A Rhoda; Cathy Tatum; Stanley Lemeshow; Mack Ruffin; J Phil Harrop; Electra D Paskett Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-10-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Ami Vyas; Suresh Madhavan; Traci LeMasters; Elvonna Atkins; Sara Gainor; Stephenie Kennedy; Kimberly Kelly; Linda Vona-Davis; Scot Remick Journal: J Community Health Date: 2012-06
Authors: Robert S Levine; George S Rust; Maria Pisu; Vincent Agboto; Peter A Baltrus; Nathaniel C Briggs; Roger Zoorob; Paul Juarez; Pamela C Hull; Irwin Goldzweig; Charles H Hennekens Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2010-09-23 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Terry C Davis; Connie L Arnold; Charles L Bennett; Michael S Wolf; Dachao Liu; Alfred Rademaker Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2015-02-18 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Terry C Davis; Connie L Arnold; Alfred Rademaker; Stacy C Bailey; Daci J Platt; Cristalyn Reynolds; Julie Esparza; Dachao Liu; Michael S Wolf Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2012-04-20 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Terry C Davis; Alfred Rademaker; Charles L Bennett; Michael S Wolf; Edson Carias; Cristalyn Reynolds; Dachao Liu; Connie L Arnold Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2013-12-24 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Jessica T DeFrank; Barbara K Rimer; Jennifer M Gierisch; J Michael Bowling; David Farrell; Celette S Skinner Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2009-04-11 Impact factor: 5.043