Literature DB >> 8203989

Is cost a barrier to screening mammography for low-income women receiving Medicare benefits? A randomized trial.

C I Kiefe1, S V McKay, A Halevy, B A Brody.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 1991, Medicare began covering screening mammograms subject to copayment and deductible. This study evaluated the effectiveness of Medicare in removing financial barriers to screening mammography among low-income older women.
METHODS: In an inner-city public hospital's General Medicine Clinic, 119 consecutive, eligible, and consenting Medicare-enrolled women without known risk factors for breast cancer other than age, and no mammogram in the previous 2 years, were entered into a randomized controlled trial with follow-up after 2 months. The mean age was 71 years; 77% were black, 92% had an annual income below $10,000, and 52% had had a previous mammogram. All patients were counseled concerning indications for screening mammograms and Medicare coverage, and all were referred to a low-cost mammography facility. Sixty-one subjects were randomly assigned a voucher for a free screening mammogram at the referral facility. Obtaining a mammogram within 60 days of study entry was the main outcome measure.
RESULTS: Of the women given vouchers, 27 (44%) obtained screening mammograms, compared with six (10%) of those without vouchers (P < .001). Adjustment by multiple logistic regression confirmed this association, yielding an adjusted odds ratio of 7.4 (95% confidence interval, 2.5 to 21.4). Knowledge concerning mammography and breast cancer increased significantly overall (and within randomization groups) between initial interview and follow-up; fear did not change. For women without the voucher, the main reason for not obtaining a mammogram was financial; the main reason for women with the voucher was transportation.
CONCLUSION: In a low-income, inner-city population of older women, financial barriers to screening mammography persist despite Medicare coverage.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8203989

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  26 in total

1.  The relation of household income to mammography utilization in a prepaid health care system.

Authors:  M B Barton; S Moore; E Shtatland; R Bright
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Disparities in screening mammography. Current status, interventions and implications.

Authors:  Monica E Peek; Jini H Han
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  The effect of Medicare reimbursement for screening mammography on utilization and payment. National Cancer Institute Breast Cancer Screening Consortium.

Authors:  N Breen; E J Feuer; S Depuy; J Zapka
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

4.  Feasible economic strategies to improve screening compliance for colorectal cancer in Korea.

Authors:  Sang Min Park; Young Ho Yun; Soonman Kwon
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Mammography using in a community-based sample of older women.

Authors:  J T Fullerton; D Kritz-Silverstein; G Robins Sadler; E Barrett-Connor
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  1996-03

6.  Health care access of poverty-level older adults in subsidized public housing.

Authors:  J A Malmgren; M L Martin; R M Nicola
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

7.  Do vouchers improve breast cancer screening rates? Results from a randomized trial.

Authors:  T J Stoner; B Dowd; W P Carr; G Maldonado; T R Church; J Mandel
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Lessons from state mandates of preventive cancer screenings.

Authors:  Wendy Yi Xu; Bryan Dowd; Jean Abraham
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2015-03-15

9.  The role of social capital in African-American women's use of mammography.

Authors:  Lorraine Dean; S V Subramanian; David R Williams; Katrina Armstrong; Camille Zubrinsky Charles; Ichiro Kawachi
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Impact of subsidizing effective anti-osteoporosis drugs on compliance with management guidelines in patients following low-impact fractures.

Authors:  Yair Liel; Hana Castel; Dan Y Bonneh
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-04-18       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.