Literature DB >> 8560337

Estimating the prevalence of low back pain in the general population. Evidence from the South Manchester Back Pain Survey.

A C Papageorgiou1, P R Croft, S Ferry, M I Jayson, A J Silman.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: This report gives the results of a population-based cross-sectional mailed questionnaire, with prospective follow-up of survey responders and nonresponders.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the 1-month period prevalence of low back pain in an adult population in the United Kingdom and to estimate the effect of nonresponse bias. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous United Kingdom population studies have reported a 1-year period prevalence of low back pain of 37%. However, the definitions of low back pain have varied, and the influence of nonresponse rarely has been reported.
METHODS: The study population was made up of all 7669 adults (18 to 75 years old) registered with two family practices in a sociodemographically mixed suburban area. The questionnaire, including a pain drawing to identify the site of any pain, was mailed to the entire study population. Two repeat mailings were sent to nonresponders. Family practice consultations about low back pain by individuals from the study population were monitored over the following 12 months using computerized records of all surgery contacts.
RESULTS: Of the study population, 4501 (59%) responded. The 1-month period prevalence of low back pain was 39% (35% in males, 42% in females). The age distribution was unimodal, with peak prevalence in those aged 45 to 59 years old. Responders to the first mailing had a small but nonsignificant increase in prevalence compared with those who responded to the second or third mailing. Nonresponders had a subsequent consultation rate for low back pain that was 22% lower than that for the survey responders.
CONCLUSIONS: After considering potential differences in nonresponders, the estimated 1-month prevalence of low back pain was between 35% and 37%. Prevalence figures in survey responders may overestimate the true population prevalence by a modest amount.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8560337     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199509000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  88 in total

Review 1.  Failed back surgery syndrome.

Authors:  V C Anderson; Z Israel
Journal:  Curr Rev Pain       Date:  2000

2.  Chronic pain, overweight, and obesity: findings from a community-based twin registry.

Authors:  Lisa Johnson Wright; Ellen Schur; Carolyn Noonan; Sandra Ahumada; Dedra Buchwald; Niloofar Afari
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 5.820

Review 3.  Epidemiology of low back pain in children and adolescents.

Authors:  G T Jones; G J Macfarlane
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Cross-sectional view of factors associated with back pain.

Authors:  Chung-Yol Lee; Renato Kratter; Nicole Duvoisin; Aydin Taskin; Julian Schilling
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 3.015

5.  Occupations associated with a high risk of self-reported back pain: representative outcomes of a back pain prevalence study in the Federal Republic of Germany.

Authors:  Sven Schneider; Slawomira Lipinski; Marcus Schiltenwolf
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Association between sitting and occupational LBP.

Authors:  Angela Maria Lis; Katia M Black; Hayley Korn; Margareta Nordin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-05-31       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Sedentary lifestyle as a risk factor for low back pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Shu-Mei Chen; Mei-Fang Liu; Jill Cook; Shona Bass; Sing Kai Lo
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 3.015

8.  The comparative prognostic value of directional preference and centralization: a useful tool for front-line clinicians?

Authors:  Audrey Long; Stephen May; Tak Fung
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2008

9.  Jogging kinematics after lumbar paraspinal muscle fatigue.

Authors:  Joseph M Hart; D Casey Kerrigan; Julie M Fritz; Christopher D Ingersoll
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  Increased low back pain prevalence in females than in males after menopause age: evidences based on synthetic literature review.

Authors:  Yì Xiáng J Wáng; Jùn-Qīng Wáng; Zoltán Káplár
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2016-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.