Literature DB >> 1386619

Low back pain in eight areas of Britain.

K Walsh1, M Cruddas, D Coggon.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: The aim was to assess the geographical variation in low back pain and associated disability in Britain.
DESIGN: This was a cross sectional survey with information collected by postal questionnaire.
SETTING: General practices in seven British towns and one rural district.
SUBJECTS: 1172 men and 1495 women aged 20-59 years were selected from the age-sex registers of 136 general practitioners in the study areas. MAIN
RESULTS: The overall lifetime and one year period prevalences of low back pain were 58.3% and 36.1%. Rates in men and women were similar. Symptoms were more common in men with manual occupations than in those with non-manual jobs, but in women there was no clear trend in relation to social class. Geographical differences in prevalence were small, but the threshold for consulting general practitioners about symptoms varied markedly from place to place. After allowance for age, sex, social class, and severity of symptoms, subjects in the northern towns of Arbroath and Peterlee who had suffered from low back pain in the past year were three to four times as likely to have consulted their doctor about the problem as those living in the southern towns of St Austell and Dorking. Consultation rates in the Midlands were intermediate.
CONCLUSIONS: Geographical variation in rates of general practice consultation for low back pain in Britain is due largely to differences in patient behaviour once symptoms have developed. The distribution of important causes of low back back pain across the country is probably fairly uniform.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1386619      PMCID: PMC1059556          DOI: 10.1136/jech.46.3.227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  13 in total

1.  Low back pain.

Authors:  T Ward; J Knowelden; W J Sharrard
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1968-02

2.  Risk of back trouble in individual occupations in Denmark.

Authors:  F Biering-Sørensen
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Epidemiology and impact of low-back pain.

Authors:  J L Kelsey; A A White
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1980 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Regional distribution of rheumatic complaints in Sweden.

Authors:  A Bjelle; E Allander
Journal:  Scand J Rheumatol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 3.641

5.  Rheumatic symptoms in the middle-aged population in southwestern Finland.

Authors:  J Takala; K Sievers; T Klaukka
Journal:  Scand J Rheumatol Suppl       Date:  1982

6.  Factors associated with self-reported back-pain prevalence: a population-based study.

Authors:  L S Reisbord; S Greenland
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1985

7.  A prospective study of low back pain in a general population. III. Medical service--work consequence.

Authors:  F Biering-Sørensen
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1983

8.  Low back trouble in a general population of 30-, 40-, 50-, and 60-year-old men and women. Study design, representativeness and basic results.

Authors:  F Biering-Sørensen
Journal:  Dan Med Bull       Date:  1982-10

9.  Interaction of height and mechanical loading of the spine in the development of low-back pain.

Authors:  K Walsh; M Cruddas; D Coggon
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 5.024

10.  Reproducibility of histories of low-back pain obtained by self-administered questionnaire.

Authors:  K Walsh; D Coggon
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  60 in total

1.  Back pain in Britain: comparison of two prevalence surveys at an interval of 10 years.

Authors:  K T Palmer; K Walsh; H Bendall; C Cooper; D Coggon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-06-10

2.  Predictors of low back pain onset in a prospective British study.

Authors:  C Power; J Frank; C Hertzman; G Schierhout; L Li
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Primary care referrals for lumbar spine radiography: diagnostic yield and clinical guidelines.

Authors:  William Hollingworth; Christopher J Todd; Hugh King; Tony Males; Adrian K Dixon; Kanti R Karia; Ann Louise Kinmonth
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Prevalence and risk factors of low back pain among nurses in a typical Nigerian hospital.

Authors:  L Sikiru; S Hanifa
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 0.927

5.  The effects of upper limb loading on spinal shrinkage during treadmill walking.

Authors:  H Watson; A Simpson; P E Riches
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Prevalence of low back pain in the community: implications for service provision in Bradford, UK.

Authors:  M Hillman; A Wright; G Rajaratnam; A Tennant; M A Chamberlain
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  Occupations associated with a high risk of self-reported back pain: representative outcomes of a back pain prevalence study in the Federal Republic of Germany.

Authors:  Sven Schneider; Slawomira Lipinski; Marcus Schiltenwolf
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  Association between sitting and occupational LBP.

Authors:  Angela Maria Lis; Katia M Black; Hayley Korn; Margareta Nordin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-05-31       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  What comprises a good outcome in spinal surgery? A preliminary survey among spine surgeons of the SSE and European spine patients.

Authors:  M Haefeli; A Elfering; M Aebi; B J C Freeman; P Fritzell; J Guimaraes Consciencia; C Lamartina; M Mayer; T Lund; N Boos
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Socioeconomic influences on back problems in the community in Britain.

Authors:  P R Croft; A S Rigby
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.710

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.