OBJECTIVES: To estimate the efficacy of dietary advice to lower blood total cholesterol concentration in free-living subjects and to investigate the efficacy of different dietary recommendations. DESIGN: Systematic overview of 19 randomised controlled trials including 28 comparisons. SUBJECTS: Free-living subjects. INTERVENTIONS: Individualised dietary advice to modify fat intake. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Percentage difference in blood total cholesterol concentration between the intervention and control groups. RESULTS: The percentage reduction in blood total cholesterol attributable to dietary advice after at least six months of intervention was 5.3% (95% confidence interval 4.7% to 5.9%). Including both short and long duration studies, the effect was 8.5% at 3 months and 5.5% at 12 months. Diets equivalent to the step 2 diet of the American Heart Association were of similar efficacy to diets that aimed to lower total fat intake or to raise the polyunsaturated to saturated fatty acid ratio. These diets were moderately more effective than the step 1 diet of the American Heart Association (6.1% v 3.0% reduction in blood total cholesterol concentration; P<0.0001). On the basis of reported food intake, the targets for dietary change were seldom achieved. The observed reductions in blood total cholesterol concentrations in the individual trials were consistent with those predicted from dietary intake on the basis of the Keys equation. CONCLUSIONS: Individualised dietary advice for reducing cholesterol concentration is modestly effective in free-living subjects. More intensive diets achieve a greater reduction in serum cholesterol concentration. Failure to comply fully with dietary recommendations is the likely explanation for this limited efficacy.
OBJECTIVES: To estimate the efficacy of dietary advice to lower blood total cholesterol concentration in free-living subjects and to investigate the efficacy of different dietary recommendations. DESIGN: Systematic overview of 19 randomised controlled trials including 28 comparisons. SUBJECTS: Free-living subjects. INTERVENTIONS: Individualised dietary advice to modify fat intake. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Percentage difference in blood total cholesterol concentration between the intervention and control groups. RESULTS: The percentage reduction in blood total cholesterol attributable to dietary advice after at least six months of intervention was 5.3% (95% confidence interval 4.7% to 5.9%). Including both short and long duration studies, the effect was 8.5% at 3 months and 5.5% at 12 months. Diets equivalent to the step 2 diet of the American Heart Association were of similar efficacy to diets that aimed to lower total fat intake or to raise the polyunsaturated to saturated fatty acid ratio. These diets were moderately more effective than the step 1 diet of the American Heart Association (6.1% v 3.0% reduction in blood total cholesterol concentration; P<0.0001). On the basis of reported food intake, the targets for dietary change were seldom achieved. The observed reductions in blood total cholesterol concentrations in the individual trials were consistent with those predicted from dietary intake on the basis of the Keys equation. CONCLUSIONS: Individualised dietary advice for reducing cholesterol concentration is modestly effective in free-living subjects. More intensive diets achieve a greater reduction in serum cholesterol concentration. Failure to comply fully with dietary recommendations is the likely explanation for this limited efficacy.
Authors: E S Sarkkinen; M I Uusitupa; P Pietinen; A Aro; I Ahola; I Penttilä; K Kervinen; Y A Kesäniemi Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 1994-01 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: S Ebrahim; G D Smith; C McCabe; N Payne; M Pickin; T A Sheldon; F Lampe; F Sampson; S Ward; G Wannamthee Journal: Qual Health Care Date: 1998-12
Authors: John P Konhilas; Hao Chen; Elizabeth Luczak; Laurel A McKee; Jessica Regan; Peter A Watson; Brian L Stauffer; Zain I Khalpey; Timothy A Mckinsey; Todd Horn; Bonnie LaFleur; Leslie A Leinwand Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2014-11-14 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Robert H Eckel; John M Jakicic; Jamy D Ard; Janet M de Jesus; Nancy Houston Miller; Van S Hubbard; I-Min Lee; Alice H Lichtenstein; Catherine M Loria; Barbara E Millen; Cathy A Nonas; Frank M Sacks; Sidney C Smith; Laura P Svetkey; Thomas A Wadden; Susan Z Yanovski; Karima A Kendall; Laura C Morgan; Michael G Trisolini; George Velasco; Janusz Wnek; Jeffrey L Anderson; Jonathan L Halperin; Nancy M Albert; Biykem Bozkurt; Ralph G Brindis; Lesley H Curtis; David DeMets; Judith S Hochman; Richard J Kovacs; E Magnus Ohman; Susan J Pressler; Frank W Sellke; Win-Kuang Shen; Sidney C Smith; Gordon F Tomaselli Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-11-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Alexis C Prince; Arifa Moosa; Miranda C E Lomer; Dianne P Reidlinger; Kevin Whelan Journal: Health Expect Date: 2014-06-17 Impact factor: 3.377