Literature DB >> 9549520

Transcranial stimulation excites virtually all motor neurons supplying the target muscle. A demonstration and a method improving the study of motor evoked potentials.

M R Magistris1, K M Rösler, A Truffert, J P Myers.   

Abstract

Transcranial stimulation has become an established method in the evaluation of corticospinal tract function. Clinical studies mainly address slowing of conduction through measurement of increased central conduction time (CCT) and 'failures' of conduction through observation of marked reductions in the size of the motor evoked potential (MEP). While CCT is of great interest in detecting subclinical slowing of conduction, the method discloses only gross failures of conduction, since the size of the MEP varies markedly between normal subjects and from one stimulus to another, leading to a broad range of normal values. Furthermore, transcranial stimulation does not appear to achieve depolarization of all spinal motor neurons leading to the target muscles, since in most normal subjects MEPs are smaller in amplitude than the responses evoked by peripheral nerve stimulation. We have developed a triple stimulation technique (TST) which, through two collisions, links central to peripheral conduction and suppresses desynchronization of MEPs. This technique shows that transcranial stimulation does achieve depolarization of all, or nearly all, spinal motor neurons supplying the target muscle in healthy subjects. Our data thus demonstrate that the amplitudes of MEPs are (i) smaller than those of peripheral responses, mostly due to phase cancellation of the action potentials caused by the desynchronization occurring within the corticospinal tract or at spinal cell level and (ii) variable between normal subjects and from one stimulus to another, mostly due to variability of this desynchronization. This technique provides new insights into normal corticospinal tract conduction. It will improve detection and quantification of central motor conduction failures.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9549520     DOI: 10.1093/brain/121.3.437

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  54 in total

1.  Age and sex differences in human motor cortex input-output characteristics.

Authors:  Julia B Pitcher; Kirstin M Ogston; Timothy S Miles
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 2.  Assessment and modulation of neural plasticity in rehabilitation with transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Shahid Bashir; Ilan Mizrahi; Kayleen Weaver; Felipe Fregni; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.298

3.  Motor cortical reorganization is present after a single attack of multiple sclerosis devoid of cortico-spinal dysfunction.

Authors:  Audrey Rico; Wafaa Zaaraoui; Jerome Franques; Shahram Attarian; Françoise Reuter; Irina Malikova; Sylviane Confort-Gouny; Elisabeth Soulier; Jean Pouget; Patrick J Cozzone; Jean Pelletier; Jean-Philippe Ranjeva; Bertrand Audoin
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Influence of motor unit properties on the size of the simulated evoked surface EMG potential.

Authors:  Kevin G Keenan; Dario Farina; Roberto Merletti; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-05       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Variability of motor potentials evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation depends on muscle activation.

Authors:  Warren G Darling; Steven L Wolf; Andrew J Butler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Modulation of corticospinal excitability during lengthening and shortening contractions in the first dorsal interosseus muscle of humans.

Authors:  Hirofumi Sekiguchi; Yutaka Kohno; Tatsuya Hirano; Masami Akai; Yasoichi Nakajima; Kimitaka Nakazawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-24       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The amplitude of lower leg motor evoked potentials is a reliable measure when controlled for torque and motor task.

Authors:  Hubertus J A van Hedel; Christian Murer; Volker Dietz; Armin Curt
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2007-04-13       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Trial-to-trial size variability of motor-evoked potentials. A study using the triple stimulation technique.

Authors:  Kai M Rösler; Denise M Roth; Michel R Magistris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Corticospinal output and loss of force during motor fatigue.

Authors:  Kai M Rösler; O Scheidegger; M R Magistris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 10.  Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research.

Authors:  Simone Rossi; Mark Hallett; Paolo M Rossini; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 3.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.