Literature DB >> 21172687

Assessment and modulation of neural plasticity in rehabilitation with transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Shahid Bashir1, Ilan Mizrahi, Kayleen Weaver, Felipe Fregni, Alvaro Pascual-Leone.   

Abstract

Despite intensive efforts to improve outcomes after acquired brain injury, functional recovery is often limited. One reason for this limitation is the challenge in assessing and guiding plasticity after brain injury. In this context, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), a noninvasive tool of brain stimulation, could play a major role. TMS has been shown to be a reliable tool for measuring plastic changes in the motor cortex associated with interventions in the motor system, such as motor training and motor cortex stimulation. In addition, as illustrated by the experience in promoting recovery from stroke, TMS is a promising therapeutic tool to minimize motor, speech, cognitive, and mood deficits. In this review, we will focus on stroke to discuss how TMS can provide insights into the mechanisms of neurologic recovery and how it can be used for measurement and modulation of plasticity after an acquired brain insult.
Copyright © 2010 American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21172687      PMCID: PMC3951769          DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.10.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PM R        ISSN: 1934-1482            Impact factor:   2.298


  110 in total

Review 1.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in neurology.

Authors:  Masahito Kobayashi; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 44.182

2.  Increased cortical excitability induced by transcranial DC and peripheral nerve stimulation.

Authors:  J Uy; M C Ridding
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  Do psychological variables modify motor recovery among patients with mild arm paresis after stroke or traumatic brain injury who receive the Arm Ability Training?

Authors:  T Platz; P Denzler
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 4.  Robotic technology and stroke rehabilitation: translating research into practice.

Authors:  Susan E Fasoli; Hermano I Krebs; Neville Hogan
Journal:  Top Stroke Rehabil       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.119

5.  Electroencephalographic recording during transcranial magnetic stimulation in humans and animals.

Authors:  John R Ives; Alexander Rotenberg; Roberto Poma; Gregor Thut; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 6.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation: a primer.

Authors:  Mark Hallett
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Effects of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the contralesional primary motor cortex on movement kinematics and neural activity in subcortical stroke.

Authors:  Dennis A Nowak; Christian Grefkes; Manuel Dafotakis; Simon Eickhoff; Jutta Küst; Hans Karbe; Gereon R Fink
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2008-06

8.  The role of diaschisis in stroke recovery.

Authors:  R J Seitz; N P Azari; U Knorr; F Binkofski; H Herzog; H J Freund
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 9.  The effects of motor cortex rTMS on corticospinal descending activity.

Authors:  V Di Lazzaro; P Profice; F Pilato; M Dileone; A Oliviero; U Ziemann
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  Reorganization of movement representations in primary motor cortex following focal ischemic infarcts in adult squirrel monkeys.

Authors:  R J Nudo; G W Milliken
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  29 in total

Review 1.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation for the prediction and enhancement of rehabilitation treatment effects.

Authors:  Michelle Harris-Love
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.649

2.  Optogenetic neuronal stimulation promotes functional recovery after stroke.

Authors:  Michelle Y Cheng; Eric H Wang; Wyatt J Woodson; Stephanie Wang; Guohua Sun; Alex G Lee; Ahmet Arac; Lief E Fenno; Karl Deisseroth; Gary K Steinberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Abnormal EEG Responses to TMS During the Cortical Silent Period Are Associated With Hand Function in Chronic Stroke.

Authors:  Whitney A Gray; Jacqueline A Palmer; Steven L Wolf; Michael R Borich
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 3.919

4.  Enhanced motor function and its neurophysiological correlates after navigated low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the contralesional motor cortex in stroke.

Authors:  Shahid Bashir; Marine Vernet; Umer Najib; Jennifer Perez; Miguel Alonso-Alonso; Mark Knobel; Woo-Kyoung Yoo; Dylan Edwards; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 2.406

5.  Endogenous TGFβ1 Plays a Crucial Role in Functional Recovery After Traumatic Brain Injury Associated with Smad3 Signal in Rats.

Authors:  Xu-Yang Wang; Ying-Chun Ba; Liu-Lin Xiong; Xiao-Li Li; Yu Zou; Ye-Chun Zhu; Xin-Fu Zhou; Ting-Hua Wang; Fang Wang; Heng-Li Tian; Jin-Tao Li
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 3.996

Review 6.  Enhancement of human cognitive performance using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

Authors:  Bruce Luber; Sarah H Lisanby
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 7.  Optogenetic Approaches to Target Specific Neural Circuits in Post-stroke Recovery.

Authors:  Michelle Y Cheng; Markus Aswendt; Gary K Steinberg
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 7.620

8.  Motor cortex excitability in acute cerebellar infarct.

Authors:  William Huynh; Arun V Krishnan; Steve Vucic; Cindy S-Y Lin; Matthew C Kiernan
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.847

9.  Post-stroke protection from maladaptive effects of learning with the non-paretic forelimb by bimanual home cage experience in C57BL/6 mice.

Authors:  Abigail L Kerr; Malerie L Wolke; Jared A Bell; Theresa A Jones
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Therapeutic Efficacy of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Acupoints on Motor and Neural Recovery of the Affected Upper Extremity in Chronic Stroke: A Sham-Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Reem M Alwhaibi; Noha F Mahmoud; Hoda M Zakaria; Walaa M Ragab; Nisreen N Al Awaji; Mahmoud Y Elzanaty; Hager R Elserougy
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.