Literature DB >> 9540230

Procrastination by pigeons with fixed-interval response requirements.

J E Mazur1.   

Abstract

Two experiments studied the phenomenon of procrastination, in which pigeons chose a larger, more delayed response requirement over a smaller, more immediate response requirement. The response requirements were fixed-interval schedules that did not lead to an immediate food reinforcer, but that interrupted a 55-s period in which food was delivered at random times. The experiments used an adjusting-delay procedure in which the delay to the start of one fixed-interval requirement was varied over trials to estimate an indifference point--a delay at which the two alternatives were chosen about equally often. Experiment 1 found that as the delay to a shorter fixed-interval requirement was increased, the adjusting delay to a longer fixed-interval requirement also increased, and the rate of increase depended on the duration of the longer fixed-interval requirement. Experiment 2 found a strong preference for a fixed delay of 10 s to the start of a fixed-interval requirement compared to a mixed delay of either 0 or 20 s. The results help to distinguish among different equations that might describe the decreasing effectiveness of a response requirement with increasing delay, and they suggest that delayed reinforcers and delayed response requirements have symmetrical but opposite effects on choice.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9540230      PMCID: PMC1284653          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1998.69-185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  17 in total

1.  Toward a quantitative theory of punishment.

Authors:  P A de Villiers
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Preference for mixed versus constant delay of reinforcement.

Authors:  R A Cicerone
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Incentive theory: II. Models for choice.

Authors:  P R Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Preference for mixed versus constant delays of reinforcement: Effect of probability of the short, mixed delay.

Authors:  D P Rider
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Separating the effects of interreinforcement time and number of interreinforcement responses.

Authors:  A J Neuringer; B A Schneider
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Commitment, choice and self-control.

Authors:  H Rachlin; L Green
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Stimulus-food relations and free-operant postponement of timeout from response-independent food presentation.

Authors:  G Galbicka; M N Branch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Conditioned reinforcement and choice with delayed and uncertain primary reinforcers.

Authors:  J E Mazur
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Procrastination by pigeons: preference for larger, more delayed work requirements.

Authors:  J E Mazur
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Adjusting delay to reinforcement: comparing choice in pigeons and humans.

Authors:  M L Rodriguez; A W Logue
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1988-01
View more
  2 in total

1.  What 50 years of research tell us about pausing under ratio schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  Henry D Schlinger; Adam Derenne; Alan Baron
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2008

2.  Further analysis of variables that affect self-control with aversive events.

Authors:  Christopher J Perrin; Nancy A Neef
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2012
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.