Literature DB >> 16812340

Stimulus-food relations and free-operant postponement of timeout from response-independent food presentation.

G Galbicka, M N Branch.   

Abstract

Grain was briefly presented to food-deprived pigeons intermittently and response-independently except during signaled timeouts. During Experiment 1, key pecks postponed the next timeout for a specified interval. Rates of pecking during time in were inversely related to the length of time pecking postponed the next timeout. Response-independent presentation of temporal distributions of timeouts exactly matched to a preceding postponement condition decreased pecking rates during Experiment 2. These results indicate that key pecking of pigeons can be controlled by response-dependent postponement of timeout, but that responses elicited by stimulus-reinforcer relations inherent in timeout-postponement procedures may substantially modify rates and patterns of pecking.

Year:  1983        PMID: 16812340      PMCID: PMC1347905          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1983.40-153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  10 in total

1.  Behavioral thermoregulation.

Authors:  B WEISS; V G LATIES
Journal:  Science       Date:  1961-04-28       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Two temporal parameters of the maintenance of avoidance behavior by the white rat.

Authors:  M SIDMAN
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1953-08

3.  Autoshaping of key pecking in pigeons with negative reinforcement.

Authors:  H Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Incompatability between the pigeons' unconditioned response to shock and the conditioned key-peck response.

Authors:  R F Smith; C R Gustavson; G L Gregor
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Escape, avoidance, punishment: where do we stand?

Authors:  J A Dinsmoor
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Key pecking as a function of response-shock and shock-shock intervals in unsignalled avoidance.

Authors:  J C Todorov; E A Ferrari; D G De Souza
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Some Effects of Noise on Human Behavior.

Authors:  N H Azrin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1958-04       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  The correlation-based law of effect.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck.

Authors:  P L Brown; H M Jenkins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Free operant avoidance as a function of the response-shock = shock-shock interval.

Authors:  F C Clark; L D Hull
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-11       Impact factor: 2.468

  10 in total
  8 in total

1.  Timeout postponement without increased reinforcement frequency.

Authors:  C J Pietras; T D Hackenberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Stock optimizing in choice when a token deposit is the operant.

Authors:  J J Widholm; A Silberberg; S R Hursh; A A Imam; F R Warren-Boulton
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Conjoint schedules of timeout deletion in pigeons.

Authors:  T D Hackenberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Discriminated timeout avoidance in pigeons: the roles of added stimuli.

Authors:  Anthony DeFulio; Timothy D Hackenberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Avoidance of timeout from response-independent food: effects of delivery rate and quality.

Authors:  Joseph V Richardson; Alan Baron
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Procrastination by pigeons with fixed-interval response requirements.

Authors:  J E Mazur
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Procrastination by pigeons: preference for larger, more delayed work requirements.

Authors:  J E Mazur
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Effects of intertrial reinforcers on self-control choice.

Authors:  J E Mazur
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.468

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.