Literature DB >> 9539007

The U.S. National Toxicology Program evaluation of transgenic mice as predictive models for identifying carcinogens.

W C Eastin1.   

Abstract

National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences researchers have invested considerable effort in exploring the utility of transgenic mice to detect carcinogens and study mechanisms of carcinogenesis. Work has assessed several mouse models genetically altered to enhance their expression of chemically induced tumors. Results with the p53def (hemizygous for the tumor-suppressor gene) and the Tg.AC (carrier of an activated H-ras oncogene) mice have been used as a basis for a proposed new strategy for identifying chemical carcinogens and assessing risk. The U.S. National Toxicology Program is conducting a series of studies with these two transgenic strains to further examine their strengths and weaknesses for identification of documented rodent and human carcinogens and to explore their ability to provide information concerning the effective dosimetry for target organ mutation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9539007      PMCID: PMC1533295          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.98106s181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  7 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of transgenic mouse bioassays for identifying carcinogens and noncarcinogens.

Authors:  R W Tennant; J Spalding; J E French
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.433

2.  Mice deficient for p53 are developmentally normal but susceptible to spontaneous tumours.

Authors:  L A Donehower; M Harvey; B L Slagle; M J McArthur; C A Montgomery; J S Butel; A Bradley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-03-19       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  v-Ha-ras transgene abrogates the initiation step in mouse skin tumorigenesis: effects of phorbol esters and retinoic acid.

Authors:  A Leder; A Kuo; R D Cardiff; E Sinn; P Leder
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Nature and nurture: possibilities for cancer control.

Authors:  R Doll
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.944

5.  Mechanism-based toxicology in cancer risk assessment: implications for research, regulation, and legislation.

Authors:  G W Lucier
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 6.  Genetic toxicology: current status of methods of carcinogen identification.

Authors:  R W Tennant; E Zeiger
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Identifying chemical carcinogens and assessing potential risk in short-term bioassays using transgenic mouse models.

Authors:  R W Tennant; J E French; J W Spalding
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 9.031

  7 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Priorities for development of research methods in occupational cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Ward; Paul A Schulte; Steve Bayard; Aaron Blair; Paul Brandt-Rauf; Mary Ann Butler; David Dankovic; Ann F Hubbs; Carol Jones; Myra Karstadt; Gregory L Kedderis; Ronald Melnick; Carrie A Redlich; Nathaniel Rothman; Russell E Savage; Michael Sprinker; Mark Toraason; Ainsley Weston; Andrew F Olshan; Patricia Stewart; Sheila Hoar Zahm
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 9.031

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.