Literature DB >> 8529591

Identifying chemical carcinogens and assessing potential risk in short-term bioassays using transgenic mouse models.

R W Tennant1, J E French, J W Spalding.   

Abstract

Cancer is a worldwide public health concern. Identifying carcinogens and limiting their exposure is one approach to the problem of reducing risk. Currently, epidemiology and rodent bioassays are the means by which putative human carcinogens are identified. Both methods have intrinsic limitations: they are slow and expensive processes with many uncertainties. The development of methods to modify specific genes in the mammalian genome has provided promising new tools for identifying carcinogens and characterizing risk. Transgenic mice may provide advantages in shortening the time required for bioassays and improving the accuracy of carcinogen identification; transgenic mice might now be included in the testing armamentarium without abandoning the two-year bioassay, the current standard. We show that mutagenic carcinogens can be identified with increased sensitivity and specificity using hemizygous p53 mice in which one allele of the p53 gene has been inactivated. Furthermore, the TG.AC transgenic model, carrying a v-Ha-ras construct, has developed papillomas and malignant tumors in response to a number of mutagenic and nonmutagenic carcinogens and tumor promoters, but not to noncarcinogens. We present a decision-tree approach that permits, at modest extra cost, the testing of more chemicals with improved ability to extrapolate from rodents to humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8529591      PMCID: PMC1519166          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.95103942

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  47 in total

1.  Classification according to chemical structure, mutagenicity to Salmonella and level of carcinogenicity of a further 42 chemicals tested for carcinogenicity by the U.S. National Toxicology Program.

Authors:  J Ashby; R W Tennant; E Zeiger; S Stasiewicz
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 2.  Prediction of the outcome of rodent carcinogenicity bioassays currently being conducted on 44 chemicals by the National Toxicology Program.

Authors:  R W Tennant; J Spalding; S Stasiewicz; J Ashby
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.000

3.  Cost-effectiveness of short-term tests for carcinogenicity.

Authors:  L B Lave; G S Omenn
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1986 Nov 6-12       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Activity of human carcinogens in the Salmonella and rodent bone-marrow cytogenetics tests.

Authors:  M D Shelby; E Zeiger
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1990 Jun-Aug       Impact factor: 2.433

5.  Scientific and cost-effectiveness criteria in selecting batteries of short-term tests.

Authors:  G S Omenn; L B Lave
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1988 May-Aug       Impact factor: 2.433

6.  Information value of the rodent bioassay.

Authors:  L B Lave; F K Ennever; H S Rosenkranz; G S Omenn
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1988-12-15       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Dermal toxicity and carcinogenicity of 4-vinyl-1-cyclohexene diepoxide in Fischer rats and B6C3F1 mice.

Authors:  R S Chhabra; J Huff; J Haseman; M P Jokinen; M Hetjmancik
Journal:  Fundam Appl Toxicol       Date:  1990-05

8.  Ethyl acrylate-induced gastric toxicity. III. Development and recovery of lesions.

Authors:  B I Ghanayem; R R Maronpot; H B Matthews
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 9.  Chemical structure, Salmonella mutagenicity and extent of carcinogenicity as indicators of genotoxic carcinogenesis among 222 chemicals tested in rodents by the U.S. NCI/NTP.

Authors:  J Ashby; R W Tennant
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 10.  Multiple-site carcinogenicity of benzene in Fischer 344 rats and B6C3F1 mice.

Authors:  J E Huff; J K Haseman; D M DeMarini; S Eustis; R R Maronpot; A C Peters; R L Persing; C E Chrisp; A C Jacobs
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of the carcinogenic potential of pharmaceuticals. Opportunities arising from the International Conference on Harmonisation.

Authors:  A M Monro; J S MacDonald
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 2.  When NRF2 talks, who's listening?

Authors:  Nobunao Wakabayashi; Stephen L Slocum; John J Skoko; Soona Shin; Thomas W Kensler
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 8.401

3.  Power, expertise and the limits of representative democracy: genetics as scientific progress or political legitimation in carcinogenic risk assessment of pharmaceuticals?

Authors:  John Abraham; Rachel Ballinger
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2011-07-20

Review 4.  The use of genetically modified mice in cancer risk assessment: challenges and limitations.

Authors:  David A Eastmond; Suryanarayana V Vulimiri; John E French; Babasaheb Sonawane
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.635

5.  Toxicology and carcinogenesis study of senna in C3B6.129F1-Trp53 tm1Brd N12 haploinsufficient mice.

Authors:  Inok Surh; Amy Brix; John E French; Bradley J Collins; J Michael Sanders; Molly Vallant; June K Dunnick
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 1.902

6.  Evaluation of dichloroacetic acid for carcinogenicity in genetically modified Tg.AC hemizygous and p53 haploinsufficient mice.

Authors:  Grace E Kissling; David E Malarkey; Molly K Vallant; Jerry D Johnson; Milton R Hejtmancik; Ronald A Herbert; Gary A Boorman
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 7.  The role of transgenic mouse models in carcinogen identification.

Authors:  John B Pritchard; John E French; Barbara J Davis; Joseph K Haseman
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Prediction of rodent nongenotoxic carcinogenesis: evaluation of biochemical and tissue changes in rodents following exposure to nine nongenotoxic NTP carcinogens.

Authors:  Clifford R Elcombe; Jenny Odum; John R Foster; Susan Stone; Susan Hasmall; Anthony R Soames; Ian Kimber; John Ashby
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 9.  Topics in cancer risk assessment.

Authors:  S S Olin; D A Neumann; J A Foran; G J Scarano
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Predictions for the outcome of rodent carcinogenicity bioassays: identification of trans-species carcinogens and noncarcinogens.

Authors:  R W Tennant; J Spalding
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.