Literature DB >> 8898993

Evaluation of transgenic mouse bioassays for identifying carcinogens and noncarcinogens.

R W Tennant1, J Spalding, J E French.   

Abstract

Data supporting the use of transgenic lines to identify carcinogens and noncarcinogens are thus far based on a limited number of chemicals for which there are also long-term bioassay results in rats and/or mice. Six chemicals have been tested in the heterozygous p53-deficient mice and 13 in the Tg.AC line. The results show that the p53def responds rapidly to mutagenic carcinogens and the Tg.AC responds rapidly to both mutagenic and nonmutagenic carcinogens. Neither transgenic line responded to the noncarcinogens that were tested. The p53def line failed to respond to two nonmutagenic carcinogens (N-methyloacrylamide and reserpine), the Tg.AC line failed to respond to ethyl acrylate, a nonmutagenic chemical that induced tumors of the forestomach when administered by gavage, and to triethanolamine that caused an increase in hepatocellular tumors in B6C3F1 mice via skin painting. Both of the latter chemicals are examples of highly specific responses related to either route of administration or to strain susceptibility. Further efforts to evaluate the range of chemicals to which these transgenic lines respond are currently in progress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8898993     DOI: 10.1016/s0165-1110(96)90016-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  7 in total

Review 1.  Therapeutic applications of dichloroacetate and the role of glutathione transferase zeta-1.

Authors:  Margaret O James; Stephan C Jahn; Guo Zhong; Marci G Smeltz; Zhiwei Hu; Peter W Stacpoole
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 12.310

2.  Animal Models of Chemical Carcinogenesis: Driving Breakthroughs in Cancer Research for 100 Years.

Authors:  Christopher J Kemp
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Protoc       Date:  2015-10-01

Review 3.  Effects of arsenic exposure on DNA methylation and epigenetic gene regulation.

Authors:  John F Reichard; Alvaro Puga
Journal:  Epigenomics       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.778

Review 4.  The use of genetically modified mice in cancer risk assessment: challenges and limitations.

Authors:  David A Eastmond; Suryanarayana V Vulimiri; John E French; Babasaheb Sonawane
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.635

Review 5.  The U.S. National Toxicology Program evaluation of transgenic mice as predictive models for identifying carcinogens.

Authors:  W C Eastin
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 6.  In vivo transgenic bioassays and assessment of the carcinogenic potential of pharmaceuticals.

Authors:  J F Contrera; J J DeGeorge
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Transgenic rats carrying human c-Ha-ras proto-oncogene are highly susceptible to N-nitrosomethylbenzylamine induction of esophageal tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Makoto Asamoto; Hiroyasu Toriyama-Baba; Takamasa Ohnishi; Akihiro Naito; Tomonori Ota; Akira Ando; Takahiro Ochiya; Hiroyuki Tsuda
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  2002-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.