Literature DB >> 9538536

Morphometric evaluations of personalised 3D reconstructions and geometric models of the human spine.

C E Aubin1, J Dansereau, F Parent, H Labelle, J A de Guise.   

Abstract

In the past, several techniques have been developed to study and analyse the 3D characteristics of the human spine: multi-view radiographic or biplanar 3D reconstructions, CT-scan 3D reconstructions and geometric models. Extensive evaluations of three of these techniques that are routinely used at Sainte-Justine Hospital (Montréal, Canada) are presented. The accuracy of these methods is assessed by comparing them with precise measurements made with a coordinate measuring machine on 17 thoracic and lumbar vertebrae (T1-L5) extracted from a normal cadaveric spine specimen. Multi-view radiographic 3D reconstructions are evaluated for different combinations of X-ray views: lateral (LAT), postero-anterior with normal incidence (PA0 degree) and postero-anterior with 20 degrees angled down incidence (PA20 degrees). The following accuracies are found for these reconstructions obtained from different radiographic setups: 2.1 +/- 1.5 mm for the combination with PA0 degree-LAT views, and 5.6 +/- 4.5 mm for the PA0 degree-PA20 degrees stereopair. Higher errors are found in the postero-anterior direction, especially for the PA0 degree-PA20 degrees view combination. Pedicles are found to be the most precise landmarks. Accuracy for CT-scan 3D reconstructions is about 1.1 +/- 0.8 mm. As for a geometric model built using a multiview radiographic reconstruction based on six landmarks per vertebra, accuracies of about 2.6 +/- 2.4 mm for landmarks and 2.3 +/- 2.0 mm for morphometric parameters are found. The geometric model and 3D reconstruction techniques give accurate information, at low X-ray dose. The accuracy assessment of the techniques used to study the 3D characteristics of the human spine is important, because it allows better and more efficient quantitative evaluations of spinal dysfunctions and their treatments, as well as biomechanical modeling of the spine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9538536     DOI: 10.1007/bf02510968

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  15 in total

1.  Kinematic analysis of spinal fusions.

Authors:  T H Olsson; G Selvik; S Willner
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1976 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.016

2.  Spinal analysis using a three-dimensional radiographic technique.

Authors:  R H Brown; A H Burstein; C L Nash; C C Schock
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Measurements of the three-dimensional shape of the rib cage.

Authors:  J Dansereau; I A Stokes
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Evaluation of Euler's angles with a least squares method for the study of lumbar spine motion.

Authors:  A Plamondon; M Gagnon
Journal:  J Biomed Eng       Date:  1990-03

5.  Quantification of three-dimensional vertebral rotations in scoliosis: what are the true values?

Authors:  W Skalli; F Lavaste; J L Descrimes
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Optimized vertical stereo base radiographic setup for the clinical three-dimensional reconstruction of the human spine.

Authors:  B André; J Dansereau; H Labelle
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Analysis of changes in the scoliotic spine using a three-dimensional radiographic technique.

Authors:  J Hindmarsh; J Larsson; O Mattsson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  A radiographic method for three-dimensional analysis of spinal configuration.

Authors:  A A De Smet; M A Tarlton; L T Cook; S L Fritz; S J Dwyer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  [Computer graphic analysis of the three dimensional deformities of scoliotic vertebrae].

Authors:  C Landry; J A De Guise; J Dansereau; H Labelle; W Skalli; R Zeller; F Lavaste
Journal:  Ann Chir       Date:  1997

10.  Three-dimensional terminology of spinal deformity. A report presented to the Scoliosis Research Society by the Scoliosis Research Society Working Group on 3-D terminology of spinal deformity.

Authors:  I A Stokes
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  23 in total

1.  Registration and geometric modelling of the spine during scoliosis surgery: a comparison study of different pre-operative reconstruction techniques and intra-operative tracking systems.

Authors:  J M Mac-Thiong; C E Aubin; J Dansereau; J A de Guise; P Brodeur; H Labelle
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  3D reconstruction method from biplanar radiography using non-stereocorresponding points and elastic deformable meshes.

Authors:  D Mitton; C Landry; S Véron; W Skalli; F Lavaste; J A De Guise
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Estimation of 3D location and orientation of human vertebral facet joints from standing digital radiographs.

Authors:  Y Petit; J Dansereau; H Labelle; J A de Guise
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Variability of the spine and pelvis location with respect to the gravity line: a three-dimensional stereoradiographic study using a force platform.

Authors:  N Gangnet; V Pomero; R Dumas; W Skalli; J-M Vital
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2003-09-16       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  Time series spinal radiographs as prognostic factors for scoliosis and progression of spinal deformities.

Authors:  Hongfa Wu; Janet L Ronsky; Farida Cheriet; James Harder; Jessica C Küpper; Ronald F Zernicke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Prediction of scoliosis progression with serial three-dimensional spinal curves and the artificial progression surface technique.

Authors:  Hongfa Wu; Janet L Ronsky; Farida Cheriet; Jessica Küpper; James Harder; Deyi Xue; Ronald F Zernicke
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Biomechanics of high-grade spondylolisthesis with and without reduction.

Authors:  Wenhai Wang; Carl-Eric Aubin; Patrick Cahill; George Baran; Pierre-Jean Arnoux; Stefan Parent; Hubert Labelle
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-08-02       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  Improving Visibility of Stereo-Radiographic Spine Reconstruction with Geometric Inferences.

Authors:  Sampath Kumar; K Prabhakar Nayak; K S Hareesha
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  A semi-automated method using interpolation and optimisation for the 3D reconstruction of the spine from bi-planar radiography: a precision and accuracy study.

Authors:  Raphaël Dumas; Bertrand Blanchard; Robert Carlier; Christian Garreau de Loubresse; Jean-Charles Le Huec; Catherine Marty; Maryse Moinard; Jean-Marc Vital
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 10.  A review of methods for quantitative evaluation of axial vertebral rotation.

Authors:  Tomaz Vrtovec; Franjo Pernus; Bostjan Likar
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.