Literature DB >> 17874152

A semi-automated method using interpolation and optimisation for the 3D reconstruction of the spine from bi-planar radiography: a precision and accuracy study.

Raphaël Dumas1, Bertrand Blanchard, Robert Carlier, Christian Garreau de Loubresse, Jean-Charles Le Huec, Catherine Marty, Maryse Moinard, Jean-Marc Vital.   

Abstract

The 3D reconstruction of the spine in upright posture can be obtained by bi-planar radiographic methods, developed since the 1970s. The principle is to identify 4-25 anatomical landmarks per vertebrae and per images. This identification time is hardly manageable in clinical practice. A semi-automated method is used: 3D standard vertebral models are positioned along with a 3D curve (identified all the way through the vertebral bodies). The silhouettes of the models of C7 and L5 vertebrae are first adjusted and the positions of the other vertebrae are interpolated and optimised. The inter- and intra-operator variabilities and the errors between the semi-automated method and the manual identification of six anatomical landmarks per vertebra are evaluated on 20 pairs of X-ray images of subjects with different spinal deformities. The identification time for the semi-automated method is 5 min. For scolitic subjects, the precision is under 2.2 degrees and the accuracy is under 3.2 degrees for all lateral, sagittal and axial rotations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17874152     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-007-0253-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  54 in total

1.  Variability of the spine and pelvis location with respect to the gravity line: a three-dimensional stereoradiographic study using a force platform.

Authors:  N Gangnet; V Pomero; R Dumas; W Skalli; J-M Vital
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2003-09-16       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Fast accurate stereoradiographic 3D-reconstruction of the spine using a combined geometric and statistic model.

Authors:  Vincent Pomero; David Mitton; Sébastien Laporte; Jacques A de Guise; Wafa Skalli
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  A comparison of four computerized methods for measuring vertebral rotation.

Authors:  G G Russell; V J Raso; D Hill; J McIvor
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Application of a stereoradiographic method for the study of intervertebral motion.

Authors:  A Plamondon; M Gagnon; G Maurais
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Progression of vertebral and spinal three-dimensional deformities in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  I Villemure; C E Aubin; G Grimard; J Dansereau; H Labelle
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Rotations of a helix as a model for correction of the scoliotic spine.

Authors:  S J Tredwell; B J Sawatzky; B L Hughes
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Three-dimensional quantitative segmental analysis of scoliosis corrected by the in situ contouring technique.

Authors:  Raphaël Dumas; Jean-Paul Steib; David Mitton; Francois Lavaste; Wafa Skalli
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Three-dimensional terminology of spinal deformity. A report presented to the Scoliosis Research Society by the Scoliosis Research Society Working Group on 3-D terminology of spinal deformity.

Authors:  I A Stokes
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Spinal shape changes resulting from scoliotic spine surgical instrumentation expressed as intervertebral rotations and centers of rotation.

Authors:  Yvan Petit; Carl-Eric Aubin; Hubert Labelle
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Variability of geometric measurements from three-dimensional reconstructions of scoliotic spines and rib cages.

Authors:  H Labelle; J Dansereau; C Bellefleur; J C Jéquier
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  9 in total

1.  Scaled, patient-specific 3D vertebral model reconstruction based on 2D lateral fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Guoyan Zheng; Lutz-P Nolte; Stephen J Ferguson
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Improving Visibility of Stereo-Radiographic Spine Reconstruction with Geometric Inferences.

Authors:  Sampath Kumar; K Prabhakar Nayak; K S Hareesha
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  A new method for determining lumbar spine motion using Bayesian belief network.

Authors:  Heather Ting Ma; Zhengyi Yang; James F Griffith; Ping Chung Leung; Raymond Y W Lee
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 4.  A review of methods for quantitative evaluation of spinal curvature.

Authors:  Tomaz Vrtovec; Franjo Pernus; Bostjan Likar
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Computer-aided assessment of scoliosis on posteroanterior radiographs.

Authors:  Junhua Zhang; Edmond Lou; Douglas L Hill; James V Raso; Yuanyuan Wang; Lawrence H Le; Xinling Shi
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Multi-view stereophotogrammetry for post-mastectomy breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Xiangyang Ju; Helga Henseler; Matthew Jian-Qiao Peng; Balvinder S Khambay; Arup K Ray; Ashraf F Ayoub
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Patient-specific 3D models created by 3D imaging system or bi-planar imaging coupled with Moiré-Fringe projections: a comparative study of accuracy and reliability on spinal curvatures and vertebral rotation data.

Authors:  Arnaud Hocquelet; François Cornelis; Anna Jirot; Laurent Castaings; Mathieu de Sèze; Olivier Hauger
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  The assessment of the postoperative spinal alignment: MRI adds up on accuracy.

Authors:  Peter Bernstein; Susanne Hentschel; Ivan Platzek; Stefan Zwingenberger; Sebastian Weigel; Sebastian Hühne; Jens Seifert
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  3D analysis of congenital scoliosis due to hemivertebra using biplanar radiography.

Authors:  Ludovic Humbert; Jean-Sébastien Steffen; Raphaël Vialle; Jean Dubousset; Jean-Marc Vital; Wafa Skalli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.134

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.