Literature DB >> 20661754

Time series spinal radiographs as prognostic factors for scoliosis and progression of spinal deformities.

Hongfa Wu1, Janet L Ronsky, Farida Cheriet, James Harder, Jessica C Küpper, Ronald F Zernicke.   

Abstract

The effectiveness of clinical measures to predict scoliotic progression is unclear. The objective of this study was to identify potential prognostic factors affecting scoliosis progression. Consecutive measurements (181) from 35 non-instrumented adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with at least two follow-up assessments were studied. Potential prognostic factors of gender, curve pattern, age, curve magnitude, apex location and lateral deviation and spinal growth were analyzed. Stable and progressed groups were compared (threshold: Cobb angle ≥5° or 10°) with sequential clinical data collected in 6-month intervals. Double curves progressed simultaneously or alternatively on curve regions. Age was not significantly different prior to and at maximal Cobb angle. Maximal Cobb angles were significantly correlated to initial Cobb angles (r = 0.81-0.98). Progressed males had larger initial Cobb angles than progressed females. Apex locations were higher in progressed than stable groups, and at least a half vertebra level higher in females than males. Maximal apex lateral deviations correlated significantly with the initial ones (r = 0.73-0.97) and moderately with maximal Cobb angles (r = 0.33-0.85). In the progressed groups, males had larger apex lateral deviations than females. Spinal growth did not relate to curve progression (r = -0.64 to +0.59) and was not significantly different between groups and genders. Scoliosis may dynamically progress between major and minor curves. Gender, curve magnitude, apex location and lateral deviation have stronger effects on scoliosis progression than age or spinal growth. Females with high apex locations may be expected to progress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20661754      PMCID: PMC3036030          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-010-1512-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  23 in total

1.  Assessment of the 3-d reconstruction and high-resolution geometrical modeling of the human skeletal trunk from 2-D radiographic images.

Authors:  S Delorme; Y Petit; J A de Guise; H Labelle; C E Aubin; J Dansereau
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Scoliosis: A prospective epidemiological study.

Authors:  H L Brooks; S P Azen; E Gerberg; R Brooks; L Chan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Height of girls with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Mauno Ylikoski
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  The natural history of idiopathic scoliosis before skeletal maturity.

Authors:  W P Bunnell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Growth and progression of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in girls.

Authors:  Mauno Ylikoski
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop B       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  Relationship of peak height velocity to other maturity indicators in idiopathic scoliosis in girls.

Authors:  D G Little; K M Song; D Katz; J A Herring
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Abnormal peri-pubertal anthropometric measurements and growth pattern in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a study of 598 patients.

Authors:  Catherine Siu King Cheung; Warren Tak Keung Lee; Yee Kit Tse; Sheng Ping Tang; Kwong Man Lee; Xia Guo; Lin Qin; Jack Chun Yiu Cheng
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Scoliosis: incidence and natural history. A prospective epidemiological study.

Authors:  E J Rogala; D S Drummond; J Gurr
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Natural history of untreated idiopathic scoliosis after skeletal maturity.

Authors:  E Ascani; P Bartolozzi; C A Logroscino; P G Marchetti; A Ponte; R Savini; F Travaglini; R Binazzi; M Di Silvestre
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Curve progression in idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  S L Weinstein; I V Ponseti
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  6 in total

1.  Reliability and accuracy of ultrasound measurements with and without the aid of previous radiographs in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

Authors:  Michelle Young; Douglas L Hill; Rui Zheng; Edmond Lou
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Pelvic tilt and trunk inclination: new predictive factors in curve progression during the Milwaukee bracing for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Jing Guo; Zhen Liu; Feng Lv; Zezhang Zhu; Bangping Qian; Xing Zhang; Xiaolong Lin; Xu Sun; Yong Qiu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Reliability and validity of lateral curvature assessments using clinical ultrasound for the patients with scoliosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Hui-Dong Wu; Wei Liu; Man-Sang Wong
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Factors relating to curve progression in female patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with a brace.

Authors:  Yong Zhang; Yijun Yang; Xiaoqian Dang; Li Zhao; Juan Ren; Ligen Zhang; Jianzhong Sun
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Reliability and Validity Study of Clinical Ultrasound Imaging on Lateral Curvature of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Authors:  Q Wang; M Li; Edmond H M Lou; M S Wong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Spinal growth velocity versus height velocity in predicting curve progression in peri-pubertal girls with idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Benlong Shi; Saihu Mao; Zhen Liu; Xu Sun; Zezhang Zhu; Feng Zhu; Jack C Y Cheng; Yong Qiu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 2.362

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.