W Skalli1, F Lavaste, J L Descrimes. 1. Laboratoire de Biomécanique, Ecole Nationale Supérieure d'Arts et Métiers (ENSAM), Paris, France.
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: The aim of this study is to quantify differences between three-dimensional rotations in space and their calculated values, either on two-dimensional projections (radiographs or computed tomographic scans) or three-dimensional calculations using various mathematical procedures. OBJECTIVE: To use a vertebral model to quantify differences between three-dimensional rotations and their calculated values, using two-dimensional projections or various three-dimensional mathematical procedures. METHODS: A specific program allowed us to move a geometric vertebral model in space using given values and sequences of lateral, sagittal, and axial rotations. Differences in positions due to different sequences were visualized and quantified. Differences due to rotation around global or vertebral axes were considered. RESULTS: For rotations of about 10 degrees, differences are about 2 degrees between three-dimensional and projected angles. Differences increase when combined rotations are large, as generally occurs in a scoliotic spine. They reach 16 degrees for lateral and sagittal rotations of 30 degrees. CONCLUSION: Axial rotation measured on transverse projection is misleading for vertebrae rotated in space. Moreover, dealing with large three-dimensional rotations is meaningful only if the used mathematical convention is given.
STUDY DESIGN: The aim of this study is to quantify differences between three-dimensional rotations in space and their calculated values, either on two-dimensional projections (radiographs or computed tomographic scans) or three-dimensional calculations using various mathematical procedures. OBJECTIVE: To use a vertebral model to quantify differences between three-dimensional rotations and their calculated values, using two-dimensional projections or various three-dimensional mathematical procedures. METHODS: A specific program allowed us to move a geometric vertebral model in space using given values and sequences of lateral, sagittal, and axial rotations. Differences in positions due to different sequences were visualized and quantified. Differences due to rotation around global or vertebral axes were considered. RESULTS: For rotations of about 10 degrees, differences are about 2 degrees between three-dimensional and projected angles. Differences increase when combined rotations are large, as generally occurs in a scoliotic spine. They reach 16 degrees for lateral and sagittal rotations of 30 degrees. CONCLUSION:Axial rotation measured on transverse projection is misleading for vertebrae rotated in space. Moreover, dealing with large three-dimensional rotations is meaningful only if the used mathematical convention is given.
Authors: Raphaël Dumas; Bertrand Blanchard; Robert Carlier; Christian Garreau de Loubresse; Jean-Charles Le Huec; Catherine Marty; Maryse Moinard; Jean-Marc Vital Journal: Med Biol Eng Comput Date: 2007-09-14 Impact factor: 2.602
Authors: Tamás S Illés; Máté Burkus; Szabolcs Somoskeőy; Fabien Lauer; Francois Lavaste; Jean F Dubousset Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2017-08-11 Impact factor: 3.075